| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
| Graphics | 38.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)
| Motherboard | Asus P5Q3 (all builds) |
| Memory | 13.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20100310 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Feb 19 '18 at 15:50 |
| Run Duration | 116 Seconds |
| Run User | AUT-User |
| Background CPU | 3% |
PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core2 Quad Q9650-$170
LGA 775, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 4.1 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
|
62.5%
Good
|
54% 86 Pts
|
32% 235 Pts
|
15% 236 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 770-$279
MSI(1462 2836) 2GB
CLim: 1306 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 390.65
|
38.5%
Below average
|
38% 48.6 fps
|
39% 49.3 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
60.2%
Good
|
71% 95.7 MB/s
|
77% 0.67 MB/s
| |
|
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28
211GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CC45 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
|
66%
Good
|
86% 114 MB/s
|
46% 0.5 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
29.3%
Poor
|
27% 9.5 GB/s
|
22% 7.87 GB/s
|
55% 72.3 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical P5Q3 Builds (Compare 113 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus P5Q3
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core2 Quad Q9550Intel $161Bench 49%, 34,093 samples | 26x |
| Core2 Quad Q9400Intel $170Bench 46%, 24,176 samples | 14x |
| Core2 Duo E8400Intel $89Bench 40%, 68,540 samples | 9x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GeForce GT 610NvidiaBench 2%, 62,458 samples | 6x |
| GeForce 9500 GTNvidiaBench 2%, 27,834 samples | 6x |
| GTX 550-TiNvidia $250Bench 9%, 54,392 samples | 4x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 50% - Above average | Total price: $221 |