Dell Precision Tower 5810

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot Drive	97.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Dell Precision Tower 5810
Motherboard	Dell Precision Tower 5810 (all builds)
Memory	12.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20160309
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Feb 19 '18 at 15:27
Run Duration	145 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	13%

PC Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-1603 v3 1,588 User benchmarks, average bench 66% SOCKET 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	72.3% Very good	Memory 88.3 1-Core 83 2-Core 166 67% 113 Pts	4-Core 326 8-Core 329 44% 328 Pts	64-Core 330 20% 330 Pts
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 72.3% Great: 72%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia NVS 310 4,920 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Nvidia(10DE 094E) 512MB CLim: 523 MHz, MLim: 437 MHz, Ram: 512MB, Driver: 388.16 Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 1% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung SM87 256GB 207 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 90GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2D0Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (70^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 4265 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 497 (AF) Unknown 100 100 0 (B0) Unknown 100 100 0 (B1) Unknown 98 98 32 (B2) Unknown 100 100 0 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B4) Unknown 100 100 1252 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (F1) Unknown 99 99 5266224274 (F2) Unknown 99 99 5058810702	97.9% Outstanding	Read 523 Write 278 Mixed 369 86% 390 MB/s	4K Read 39.3 4K Write 104 4K Mixed 40.9 167% 61.5 MB/s	DQ Read 201 DQ Write 213 DQ Mixed 96.7 103% 170 MB/s
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 97.9% Great: 114%
WD Blue 320GB (2008)-$39 64,707 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 87GB free Firmware: 3E02 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing below expectations (31^st percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 138 132 4091 (04) Start/Stop count 97 97 3889 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 63 63 27579 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1575 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 84 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 199 199 3889 (C2) HDA temperature 104 101 39 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0 (F0) Head flying hours 70 70 22251 (F1) Unknown 200 200 9674571488 (F2) Unknown 200 200 15218816179	39.5% Below average	Read 70.4 Write 66.9 Mixed 66.7 51% 68 MB/s	4K Read 0.35 4K Write 2.11 4K Mixed 0.35 93% 0.94 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 39.5% Great: 60%
Seagate Backup+ BK 2TB 80 User benchmarks, average bench 31% 1.5TB free, PID ab20 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	42.4% Average	Read 95.4 Write 113 Mixed 85.4 127% 97.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.31 4K Write 1.27 4K Mixed 0.22 52% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 42.4% Great: 46%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMA451R7AFR8N-TF 4x4GB 395 User benchmarks, average bench 91% 4 of 8 slots used 16GB RIMM 2133 MHz clocked @ 1866 MHz Performing below potential (33^rd percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	87.2% Excellent	MC Read 30.3 MC Write 39 MC Mixed 30.9 95% 33.4 GB/s	SC Read 13.5 SC Write 15.6 SC Mixed 19.1 46% 16.1 GB/s	Latency 69.2 58% 69.2 ns
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 87.2% Great: 107%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Precision Tower 5810 Builds (Compare 5,220 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 31%

Sail boat

Desktop 79%

Battleship

Workstation 27%

Raft

Motherboard: Dell Precision Tower 5810

CPU
Xeon E5-1620 v3IntelBench 72%, 10,197 samples	1,239x
Xeon E5-1650 v3IntelBench 77%, 7,962 samples	955x
Xeon E5-1650 v4IntelBench 83%, 3,842 samples	408x

GPU
Quadro M4000NvidiaBench 32%, 9,043 samples	414x
Quadro K2200Nvidia $440Bench 16%, 13,860 samples	385x
Quadro M2000NvidiaBench 21%, 5,678 samples	287x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	108x
SM871 2.5 7mm 256GBSamsungBench 94%, 1,320 samples	105x
MX500 500GBCrucial $55Bench 106%, 237,241 samples	62x

RAM
HMA451R7MFR8N-TF 4x4GBHynixBench 90%, 1,961 samples	348x
HMA41GR7MFR8N-TF 4x8GBHynixBench 96%, 1,319 samples	208x
9ASF1G72PZ-2G3B1 4x8GBMicronBench 93%, 857 samples	193x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 27% - Poor

Total price: $80

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16