Performance Results


Gaming 1% Tree trunk	Desktop 29% Raft	Workstation 1% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 40.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	0.73% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	28.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	3GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 3GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3 M 330 14,119 User benchmarks, average bench 38% N/A, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.15 GHz, turbo 2.1 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)	40.8% Average	Memory 62 1-Core 46.6 2-Core 82.6 41% 63.7 Pts	4-Core 113 8-Core 132 16% 122 Pts	64-Core 133 8% 133 Pts
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 40.8% Great: 43%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (Arrandale 0.667/0.766 GHz) 99,513 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Sony(104D 9071) 1.2GB Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2900 Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	0.73% Terrible	Lighting 0.8 Reflection 1.04 Parallax 0.81 1% 0.88 fps	MRender 1.29 Gravity 0.67 Splatting 1.26 1% 1.07 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.73% Great: 1%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Sandisk S128G 126GB 21,984 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 85GB free (System drive) Firmware: 3.2.0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below potential (5^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 1492 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 1177 (A5) Unknown 100 100 534449 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 100 100 136 (AE) Unknown 100 100 98 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 72 28 197568495644 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 453 (E8) Unknown 100 100 0 (EA) Unknown 100 100 346 (F1) Unknown 100 100 13671143214 (F2) Unknown 100 100 19216030260	28.1% Poor	Read 230 Write 182 Mixed 175 44% 196 MB/s	4K Read 8.98 4K Write 9.15 4K Mixed 4.49 24% 7.54 MB/s	DQ Read 16.3 DQ Write 13.5 DQ Mixed 7.95 8% 12.6 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 28.1% Great: 56%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 3GB 81,553 User benchmarks, average bench 14% null MHz 2048, 1024 MB Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	23.4% Poor	MC Read 7.8 MC Write 6.8 MC Mixed 9.4 23% 8 GB/s	SC Read 6.6 SC Write 5.2 SC Mixed 6.4 17% 6.07 GB/s	Latency 122 33% 122 ns
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 23.4% Great: 23%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16