MSI X370 GAMING M7 ACK (MS-7A35)

Performance Results


Gaming 61% Destroyer	Desktop 79% Battleship	Workstation 61% Destroyer


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	75.8% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	123% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (44%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago.

System	Micro-Star MS-7A35
Motherboard	MSI X370 GAMING M7 ACK (MS-7A35) (all builds)
Memory	10.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170912
Uptime	0.6 Days
Run Date	Feb 19 '18 at 04:42
Run Duration	134 Seconds
Run User	CAN-User
Background CPU	44%

Watch Gameplay: Vega-56 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (48^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 1700X-$225 66,470 User benchmarks, average bench 71% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)	74.7% Very good	Memory 70.7 1-Core 105 2-Core 210 71% 128 Pts	4-Core 422 8-Core 802 73% 612 Pts	64-Core 1,132 70% 1,132 Pts
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 74.7% Great: 80%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX Vega-56-$170 92,053 User benchmarks, average bench 78% MSI(1462 3681) CLim: 1622 MHz, MLim: 800 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 18.2.2 Performing below potential (39^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	75.8% Very good	Lighting 86.9 Reflection 86.7 Parallax 137 71% 104 fps	MRender 83.8 Gravity 98.2 Splatting 122 85% 101 fps
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 75.8% Great: 85%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial MX300 525GB-$150 105,037 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 489GB free Firmware: M0CR040 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 15 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 9 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 100 100 1 (AE) Unknown 100 100 6 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 67 64 154620067873 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 100 100 0 (CE) Flying height 100 100 0 (F6) Unknown 100 100 21049763 (F7) Unknown 100 100 671943 (F8) Unknown 100 100 275017 (B4) Unknown 0 0 1945 (D2) Unknown 100 100 0	72.6% Very good	Read 478 Write 341 Mixed 340 86% 387 MB/s	4K Read 22.8 4K Write 47.3 4K Mixed 21.5 87% 30.6 MB/s	DQ Read 167 DQ Write 108 DQ Mixed 45.1 58% 107 MB/s
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 72.6% Great: 99%
WD Black NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB (2017)-$154 14,088 User benchmarks, average bench 131% 353GB free (System drive) Firmware: B35500WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Performing as expected (44^th percentile)	123% Outstanding	Read 1,493 Write 474 Mixed 528 180% 832 MB/s	4K Read 32 4K Write 48.2 4K Mixed 15.2 93% 31.8 MB/s	DQ Read 194 DQ Write 127 DQ Mixed 44 64% 122 MB/s
Poor: 84% ↑ This bench: 123% Great: 155%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2016)-$114 34,353 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 3.5TB free Firmware: 0001 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 72 66 15233489 (03) Spinup time 94 94 0 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 13 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 85075 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 -32963873996785 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 11 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 73 72 454754331 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 8 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 42 (C2) HDA temperature 27 40 81604378651 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 70742406332426 (F1) Unknown 100 253 11814016 (F2) Unknown 100 253 3419473	102% Outstanding	Read 177 Write 178 Mixed 134 122% 163 MB/s	4K Read 0.71 4K Write 2.14 4K Mixed 0.29 102% 1.05 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 102% Great: 105%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL Trident Z RGB DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB-$55 215,644 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 2133 MHz clocked @ 1067 MHz Performing below potential (27^th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	73.5% Very good	MC Read 28.8 MC Write 25.5 MC Mixed 26 76% 26.8 GB/s	SC Read 18.3 SC Write 24.5 SC Mixed 21.2 61% 21.3 GB/s	Latency 99.7 40% 99.7 ns
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 73.5% Great: 107%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X370 GAMING M7 ACK (MS-7A35) Builds (Compare 45 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 79%

Battleship

Desktop 79%

Battleship

Workstation 78%

Battleship

Motherboard: MSI X370 GAMING M7 ACK (MS-7A35)

CPU
Ryzen 7 1800XAMD $60Bench 72%, 30,050 samples	12x
Ryzen 7 1700XAMD $225Bench 71%, 66,470 samples	9x
Ryzen 5 1600XAMD $125Bench 74%, 140,440 samples	6x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	11x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	5x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	3x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	4x
MX500 1TBCrucial $66Bench 106%, 202,785 samples	3x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	3x

RAM
Flare X DDR4 3200 C14 4x8GBG.SKILL $192Bench 106%, 7,103 samples	4x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	3x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $36Bench 84%, 287,720 samples	3x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 66% - Good

Total price: $752

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

MSI X370 GAMING M7 ACK (MS-7A35)

Performance Results

Run History

PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Motherboard: MSI X370 GAMING M7 ACK (MS-7A35)

Feedback

PC Performing as expected (48^th percentile)