Asrock EP2C602

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics19.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive72.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago.
MotherboardAsrock EP2C602  (all builds)
Memory30.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display1400 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20131209
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 18 '18 at 23:31
Run Duration185 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2670 0
CPUSocket, 2 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
59.9% Above average
Memory 57.2
1-Core 86.4
2-Core 174
58% 106 Pts
4-Core 336
8-Core 625
57% 480 Pts
64-Core 1,622
100% 1,622 Pts
Poor: 52%
This bench: 59.9%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$92
CLim: 1450 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 390.65
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
19.7% Very poor
Lighting 24.5
Reflection 19
Parallax 22.3
20% 21.9 fps
MRender 27.2
Gravity 25.4
Splatting 19
19% 23.9 fps
Poor: 16%
This bench: 19.7%
Great: 19%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45
36GB free
Firmware: 3B7Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
157% Outstanding
Read 1,524
Write 911
Mixed 1,060
258% 1,165 MB/s
4K Read 26.5
4K Write 77.3
4K Mixed 28.4
118% 44.1 MB/s
DQ Read 36.3
DQ Write 185
DQ Mixed 16.5
40% 79.3 MB/s
Poor: 142%
This bench: 157%
Great: 236%
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$95
12GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0CB6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
72.7% Very good
Read 495
Write 345
Mixed 347
88% 396 MB/s
4K Read 27.4
4K Write 49.8
4K Mixed 14.3
86% 30.5 MB/s
DQ Read 276
DQ Write 28.9
DQ Mixed 40.3
58% 115 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 72.7%
Great: 118%
Seagate Desktop HDD 4TB (2013)-$52
2TB free
Firmware: CC52 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
75% Very good
Read 127
Write 134
Mixed 86.5
86% 116 MB/s
4K Read 0.72
4K Write 1.15
4K Mixed 0.22
76% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 75%
Great: 96%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$49
12GB free
Firmware: 05.01D05 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 35% Great: 76%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F3 DDR3 1600 C8 8x4GB
8 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1866 MHz
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
80.5% Excellent
MC Read 37.4
MC Write 31.9
MC Mixed 29.5
94% 32.9 GB/s
SC Read 13.2
SC Write 5.9
SC Mixed 7.2
25% 8.77 GB/s
Latency 136
29% 136 ns
Poor: 80%
This bench: 80.5%
Great: 97%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical EP2C602 Builds (Compare 39 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 68%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 75%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asrock EP2C602

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 123% - Outstanding Total price: $200
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $15Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback