Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming K7

Performance Results


Gaming 78% Battleship	Desktop 84% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 77% Battleship


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	89.4% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	74.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming K7 (all builds)
Memory	11.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170616
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Feb 18 '18 at 22:05
Run Duration	160 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	5%

PC Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 1700-$195 144,475 User benchmarks, average bench 69% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	82.5% Excellent	Memory 78.3 1-Core 117 2-Core 233 79% 143 Pts	4-Core 465 8-Core 817 77% 641 Pts	64-Core 1,210 75% 1,210 Pts
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 82.5% Great: 81%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX Vega-64-$400 91,676 User benchmarks, average bench 87% AMD(1002 6B76) CLim: 1630 MHz, MLim: 945 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 18.1.1 Performing below potential (76^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	89.4% Excellent	Lighting 109 Reflection 90.9 Parallax 149 89% 116 fps	MRender 88.3 Gravity 107 Splatting 129 91% 108 fps
Poor: 77% ↑ This bench: 89.4% Great: 94%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SanDisk Ultra II 480GB-$39 62,883 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 120GB free (System drive) Firmware: X41320RL Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 12048 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 584 (A5) Unknown 100 100 52363925 (A6) Unknown 100 100 2 (A7) Unknown 100 100 27 (A8) Unknown 100 100 14 (A9) Unknown 100 100 553 (AA) Unknown 100 100 0 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 100 100 7 (AE) Unknown 100 100 121 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 66 65 279173922850 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 1477485527384 (E8) Unknown 100 100 100 (E9) Unknown 100 100 3289 (EA) Unknown 100 100 13569 (F1) Unknown 253 253 10899 (F2) Unknown 253 253 6234 (F4) Unknown 0 100 0	74.8% Very good	Read 499 Write 352 Mixed 330 87% 394 MB/s	4K Read 31.8 4K Write 51 4K Mixed 18.4 99% 33.7 MB/s	DQ Read 31.7 DQ Write 161 DQ Mixed 11.6 34% 68.2 MB/s
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 74.8% Great: 108%
WD Blue 2TB (2015)-$84 253,816 User benchmarks, average bench 65% 337GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (43^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 1293 (03) Spinup time 172 171 4400 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 409 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 94 94 4811 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 341 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 133 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 180 180 60113 (C2) HDA temperature 114 106 33 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 26 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 2 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 4	63.1% Good	Read 110 Write 109 Mixed 103 81% 107 MB/s	4K Read 0.69 4K Write 2.16 4K Mixed 0.27 98% 1.04 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 63.1% Great: 84%
Seagate ST3500820AS 500GB 4,420 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 155GB free Firmware: LC11 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing as expected (42^nd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 103 95 90857743 (03) Spinup time 92 87 0 (04) Start/Stop count 97 97 3892 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 72 60 47431923206 (09) Power-on hours count 69 69 27950 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 97 257 (0C) Power cycle count 98 37 2843 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 69 69 31 (BC) Unknown 100 98 502518972548 (BD) vendor-specific 97 97 3 (BE) vendor-specific 61 49 672596007 (C2) HDA temperature 39 51 42949672999 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 36 22 90857743 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 107 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 107 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 1 15162	44.4% Average	Read 64 Write 90.8 Mixed 83.7 60% 79.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.47 4K Write 1.14 4K Mixed 0.38 83% 0.66 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 44.4% Great: 60%
Toshiba DT01ACA050 500GB-$25 163,843 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 131GB free Firmware: MS1OA750 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way above expectations (85^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 142 142 70 (03) Spinup time 134 134 12895518900 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 1830 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 115 115 34 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 20163 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 865 (C0) Power-off retract count 99 99 1950 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 99 99 1950 (C2) HDA temperature 166 166 214749216804 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	96.1% Outstanding	Read 173 Write 162 Mixed 165 126% 167 MB/s	4K Read 0.63 4K Write 1.61 4K Mixed 0.17 75% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 96.1% Great: 103%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB-$36 287,720 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)	88.7% Excellent	MC Read 35.1 MC Write 30.3 MC Mixed 31 92% 32.1 GB/s	SC Read 22 SC Write 31.9 SC Mixed 26.3 76% 26.7 GB/s	Latency 83.7 48% 83.7 ns
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 88.7% Great: 109%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-AX370-Gaming K7 Builds (Compare 523 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 79%

Battleship

Desktop 79%

Battleship

Workstation 77%

Battleship

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming K7 - $229

CPU
Ryzen 7 1800XAMD $60Bench 72%, 30,050 samples	96x
Ryzen 7 1700XAMD $225Bench 71%, 66,470 samples	69x
Ryzen 7 1700AMD $195Bench 69%, 144,475 samples	59x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	67x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	57x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	28x

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	22x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 213%, 165,668 samples	20x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GBSamsung $45Bench 199%, 240,629 samples	17x

RAM
Flare X DDR4 3200 C14 2x8GBG.SKILL $73Bench 98%, 54,616 samples	20x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $36Bench 84%, 287,720 samples	18x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	11x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $871

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming K7

Performance Results

PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming K7 - $229

Feedback

PC Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)