Packard EasyNote TM82

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 35.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory3GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 3GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (29%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemPackard EasyNote TM82  (all builds)
MotherboardPackard EasyNote TM82
Memory1.4 GB free of 3 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100601
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateFeb 17 '18 at 22:36
Run Duration124 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU 29%

 PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon II P320-$20
Socket S1G4, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 2.1 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
35.4% Below average
Memory 63.6
1-Core 24.1
2-Core 43.2
32% 43.6 Pts
4-Core 42.7
8-Core 55.7
6% 49.2 Pts
64-Core 55.4
3% 55.4 Pts
Poor: 23%
This bench: 35.4%
Great: 40%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5470
Acer(1025 036E) 512MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008
Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 1% Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ST9320325AS 320GB-$34
228GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0001 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
34.1% Below average
Read 62.7
Write 56
Mixed 52.5
43% 57.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.41
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.28
63% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 34.1%
Great: 39%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B2873FHS-CF8 M471B5673FH0-CH9 3GB
1066, 1066 MHz
1024, 2048 MB
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
20.3% Poor
MC Read 7.6
MC Write 5.7
MC Mixed 7.9
20% 7.07 GB/s
SC Read 4.2
SC Write 3.9
SC Mixed 3.7
11% 3.93 GB/s
Latency 118
34% 118 ns
Poor: 13%
This bench: 20.3%
Great: 33%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical EasyNote TM82 Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete

System: Packard EasyNote TM82

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 70% - Very good Total price: $20
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback