Gigabyte GA-X299 AORUS Gaming 9

Performance Results


Gaming 86% Aircraft carrier	Desktop 98% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 90% Nuclear submarine


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 96.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	87.2% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	219% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-X299 AORUS Gaming 9 (all builds)
Memory	29.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180110
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Feb 17 '18 at 22:17
Run Duration	138 Seconds
Run User	TUR-User
Background CPU	2%

Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-7820X-$375 28,524 User benchmarks, average bench 80% CPU0, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.6 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	96.4% Outstanding	Memory 83.3 1-Core 150 2-Core 298 96% 177 Pts	4-Core 586 8-Core 1,113 101% 850 Pts	64-Core 1,656 102% 1,656 Pts
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 96.4% Great: 92%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$400 1,082,454 User benchmarks, average bench 102% MSI(1462 336C) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2113 MHz, MLim: 2802 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 390.77 Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	87.2% Excellent	Lighting 99.8 Reflection 114 Parallax 94.4 81% 103 fps	MRender 116 Gravity 135 Splatting 113 99% 121 fps
Poor: 93% ↑ This bench: 87.2% Great: 110%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$139 63,520 User benchmarks, average bench 266% 436GB free (System drive) Firmware: 4B6QCXP7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)	219% Outstanding	Read 1,838 Write 1,719 Mixed 1,621 385% 1,726 MB/s	4K Read 23.3 4K Write 42.2 4K Mixed 28.8 94% 31.4 MB/s	DQ Read 193 DQ Write 314 DQ Mixed 13.5 78% 173 MB/s
Poor: 159% ↑ This bench: 219% Great: 353%
Samsung Spinpoint F2 1TB-$60 32,476 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 683GB free Firmware: 1AG01118 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 99 5 (03) Spinup time 74 74 8500 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 1314 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 253 253 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 6013 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 1 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1233 (0D) Soft read error rate 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 1 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 68 64 538705952 (C2) HDA temperature 65 62 589037603 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 436483 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 99 69 (C8) Write error rate 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 253 253 0	50.9% Above average	Read 86.1 Write 91.3 Mixed 94.8 69% 90.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.37 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.28 71% 0.65 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 50.9% Great: 58%
Seagate ST32000641AS 2TB-$174 8,506 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 542GB free Firmware: CC13 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 115 99 99571591 (03) Spinup time 100 100 0 (04) Start/Stop count 97 97 3890 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 72 60 20570756 (09) Power-on hours count 77 77 20748 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 97 97 3119 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 99 4295032833 (BD) vendor-specific 99 99 1 (BE) vendor-specific 52 44 35167731760 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 749 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 99 99 4041 (C2) HDA temperature 48 56 64424509488 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 31 16 99571591 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 -107855218707833 (F1) Unknown 100 253 207865824 (F2) Unknown 100 253 3036697277	43.4% Average	Read 69.8 Write 81.3 Mixed 88.4 61% 79.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.54 4K Write 0.94 4K Mixed 0.38 82% 0.62 MB/s
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 43.4% Great: 73%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x16GB 46,387 User benchmarks, average bench 91% 2 of 8 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3400 MHz Performing below potential (20^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	67.7% Good	MC Read 22.2 MC Write 33 MC Mixed 19.8 71% 25 GB/s	SC Read 9.4 SC Write 24.9 SC Mixed 11.9 44% 15.4 GB/s	Latency 74.7 54% 74.7 ns
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 67.7% Great: 164%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-X299 AORUS Gaming 9 Builds (Compare 216 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 102%

UFO

Desktop 88%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 110%

UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X299 AORUS Gaming 9 - $500

CPU
Core i9-7900XIntel $420Bench 82%, 19,432 samples	67x
Core i7-7820XIntel $375Bench 80%, 28,524 samples	58x
Core i9-7920XIntel $250Bench 82%, 5,430 samples	19x

GPU
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	63x
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	32x
RTX 2080-TiNvidia $441Bench 156%, 357,946 samples	19x

SSD
960 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsung $139Bench 266%, 63,520 samples	21x
960 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $249Bench 279%, 18,356 samples	14x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GBSamsung $45Bench 199%, 240,629 samples	10x

RAM
4x8GBUnknownBench 70%, 41,916 samples	60x
4x16GBUnknownBench 98%, 9,153 samples	27x
2x16GBUnknownBench 91%, 46,387 samples	23x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $1,544

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16