bin bin

Performance Results


Gaming 15% Surfboard	Desktop 73% Battleship	Workstation 13% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (75th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 25 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	14.6% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	47.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago.

System
Motherboard	Intel DH61BE
Memory	5.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20131112
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Feb 17 '18 at 16:23
Run Duration	143 Seconds
Run User	HUN-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-3340-$278 8,792 User benchmarks, average bench 66% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	71.7% Very good	Memory 84.2 1-Core 90.5 2-Core 180 69% 118 Pts	4-Core 343 8-Core 345 46% 344 Pts	64-Core 344 21% 344 Pts
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 71.7% Great: 74%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 460-$203 31,648 User benchmarks, average bench 12% Gainward(10B0 0801) 1GB CLim: 800 MHz, MLim: 1000 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 390.77 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	14.6% Very poor	Lighting 16.7 Reflection 19.8 Parallax 15.2 14% 17.2 fps	MRender 23.6 Gravity 17.2 Splatting 20 16% 20.3 fps
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 14.6% Great: 14%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 131GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT01B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 1825 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 1506 (B1) Unknown 98 98 24 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 66 45 34 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 54 (F1) Unknown 99 99 13519524245	47.2% Average	Read 268 Write 213 Mixed 218 52% 233 MB/s	4K Read 23.4 4K Write 32.9 4K Mixed 16 74% 24.1 MB/s	DQ Read 30.2 DQ Write 39.1 DQ Mixed 16 17% 28.4 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 47.2% Great: 124%
Samsung Spinpoint F4 2TB-$119 45,158 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 2TB free Firmware: 1AQ1 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 59 (02) Throughput performance 252 252 0 (03) Spinup time 67 11 10174 (04) Start/Stop count 82 82 18666 (05) Reallocated sector count 252 252 0 (07) Seek error rate 252 252 0 (08) Seek timer performance 252 252 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 19431 (0A) Spinup retry count 252 252 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 19 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1506 (B5) Unknown 100 100 191657 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 21 (C0) Power-off retract count 252 252 0 (C2) HDA temperature 64 57 236224053271 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 0 (C4) Reallocation count 252 252 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 252 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 252 252 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 1 1 505072 (DF) Load/unload retry count 100 100 19 (E1) Load/Unload cycle count 99 99 18863	77.6% Very good	Read 118 Write 153 Mixed 127 100% 133 MB/s	4K Read 0.62 4K Write 2.15 4K Mixed 0.44 115% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 77.6% Great: 72%
Samsung HD322GJ 320GB 9,769 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 175GB free Firmware: 1AR10001 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 424 (02) Throughput performance 252 252 0 (03) Spinup time 84 76 4862 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 1415 (05) Reallocated sector count 252 252 0 (07) Seek error rate 252 252 0 (08) Seek timer performance 252 252 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 5246 (0A) Spinup retry count 252 252 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 1 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1188 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 35 (C0) Power-off retract count 252 252 0 (C2) HDA temperature 64 59 176094642200 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 0 (C4) Reallocation count 252 252 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 252 252 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 252 252 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 91 91 5226 (C8) Write error rate 100 100 57 (DF) Load/unload retry count 100 100 1 (E1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 1434	77.3% Very good	Read 133 Write 136 Mixed 122 98% 131 MB/s	4K Read 0.49 4K Write 1.84 4K Mixed 0.32 90% 0.88 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 77.3% Great: 81%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 9905403-441.A00LF 2x4GB 108 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 2 of 2 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)	52.5% Above average	MC Read 18.7 MC Write 19.1 MC Mixed 16.6 52% 18.1 GB/s	SC Read 15.4 SC Write 15.8 SC Mixed 16 45% 15.7 GB/s	Latency 73.2 55% 73.2 ns
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 52.5% Great: 56%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,245 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 61%

Destroyer

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

CPU
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	2,022x
Core i7-2600Intel $195Bench 67%, 185,630 samples	1,566x
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples	932x

GPU
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	1,322x
SVGA 3DVmwareBench 20%, 11,474 samples	1,139x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	1,040x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	821x
Virtual NVMe Disk 64GBVmwareBench 62%, 2,103 samples	455x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	424x

RAM
2x2GBUnknownBench 20%, 446,702 samples	516x
4x2GBUnknownBench 25%, 183,252 samples	376x
1x8GBUnknownBench 38%, 168,538 samples	297x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $325

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16