Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 14.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS Version	Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.

Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Atom N270 3,302 User benchmarks, average bench 20% U2E1, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.6 GHz, turbo 1.6 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	14.2% Very poor	Memory 26.9 1-Core 6.5 2-Core 11 12% 14.8 Pts	4-Core 10.5 8-Core 10.7 1% 10.6 Pts	64-Core 10.9 1% 10.9 Pts
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 14.2% Great: 33%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung HM160HI 160GB-$50 4,054 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 113GB free (System drive) Firmware: HH100-06 Max speed: SATA 1.0 150 MB/s Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 252 252 2000 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 1804 (05) Reallocated sector count 252 252 0 (07) Seek error rate 252 252 0 (08) Seek timer performance 252 252 0 (09) Power-on hours count 92 92 4415 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 6 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 938 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 5744 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 78 (C2) HDA temperature 133 85 227634118691 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 1 (C4) Reallocation count 252 252 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 252 252 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 252 252 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 252 252 0 (DF) Load/unload retry count 100 100 674 (E1) Load/Unload cycle count 76 76 251609	32.8% Below average	Read 54.7 Write 59.3 Mixed 56.3 43% 56.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.37 4K Write 1.28 4K Mixed 0.32 75% 0.66 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 32.8% Great: 36%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 1x2GB 99,586 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 1 of 2 slots used 2GB SODIMM DDR2 Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	8.01% Terrible	MC Read 3.2 MC Write 2.7 MC Mixed 2.1 8% 2.67 GB/s	SC Read 1.3 SC Write 2.6 SC Mixed 1.8 5% 1.9 GB/s	Latency 273 15% 273 ns
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 8.01% Great: 26%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16