Asus MAXIMUS V EXTREME

Performance Results


Gaming 12% Tree trunk	Desktop 72% Battleship	Workstation 10% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (20th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 80 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	12% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	66.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (47%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago, 5 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus MAXIMUS V EXTREME (all builds)
Memory	7.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20130819
Uptime	7 Days
Run Date	Feb 16 '18 at 02:31
Run Duration	80 Seconds
Run User	CAN-User
Background CPU	47%

PC Performing below expectations (20^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-3770K-$175 165,979 User benchmarks, average bench 72% LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)	69.3% Good	Memory 84.8 1-Core 102 2-Core 190 73% 126 Pts	4-Core 301 8-Core 369 43% 335 Pts	64-Core 488 30% 488 Pts
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 69.3% Great: 83%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 780-$329 50,279 User benchmarks, average bench 45% EVGA(3842 2781) 3GB CLim: 1202 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 388.13 Relative performance (0^th percentile)	12% Very poor	Lighting 22.3 Reflection 16.7 Parallax 33.5 18% 24.2 fps
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 12% Great: 49%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
OCZ RevoDrive 3 X2 PCIe 240GB 1,088 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 29GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2.25 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Performing below expectations (27^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 112 112 232372110 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 82 82 79053168066471 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1674 (AB) Unknown 0 0 0 (AC) Unknown 0 0 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 496 (B1) Unknown 0 0 7 (B5) Unknown 0 0 0 (B6) Unknown 0 0 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 30 30 128850984990 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 120 120 232372110 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 120 120 232372110 (CC) Soft ECC correction 120 120 232372110 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 100 (E7) Temperature 100 100 0 (E9) Unknown 0 0 26908 (EA) Unknown 0 0 13397 (F1) Unknown 0 0 13397 (F2) Unknown 0 0 14183	66.3% Good	Read 751 Write 155 Mixed 188 78% 365 MB/s	4K Read 20 4K Write 38.6 4K Mixed 9.99 64% 22.9 MB/s	DQ Read 237 DQ Write 140 DQ Mixed 56 77% 144 MB/s
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 66.3% Great: 89%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Dominator DDR3 2400 C10 4x4GB 104 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 4 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	38.2% Below average	MC Read 13.1 MC Write 12 MC Mixed 12 35% 12.4 GB/s	SC Read 11.9 SC Write 13.4 SC Mixed 13.3 37% 12.9 GB/s	Latency 72.1 56% 72.1 ns
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 38.2% Great: 89%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical MAXIMUS V EXTREME Builds (Compare 306 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 76%

Battleship

Desktop 80%

Battleship

Workstation 62%

Destroyer

Motherboard: Asus MAXIMUS V EXTREME - $550

CPU
Core i7-3770KIntel $175Bench 72%, 165,979 samples	190x
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	47x
Core i7-2600KIntel $319Bench 71%, 147,533 samples	20x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	27x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	16x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	15x

SSD
870 EVO 1TBSamsung $89Bench 112%, 129,044 samples	13x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	10x
850 Evo 1TBSamsung $130Bench 110%, 154,399 samples	8x

RAM
HyperX DDR3 1866 C10 4x8GBKingstonBench 63%, 12,722 samples	10x
TridentX DDR3 2400 C10 4x8GBG.SKILLBench 74%, 7,519 samples	8x
TridentX DDR3 2400 C10 2x8GBG.SKILLBench 67%, 24,592 samples	8x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $1,214

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16