Medion Erazer P7643 MD60397

Performance Results


Gaming 10% Tree trunk	Desktop 56% Gunboat	Workstation 8% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 43.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	16.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	38.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 99% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.

System	Medion Erazer P7643 MD60397 (all builds)
Motherboard	Medion D17SHN
Memory	3.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben,
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20160721
Uptime	1.8 Days
Run Date	Feb 15 '18 at 21:53
Run Duration	197 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	16%
CPU Throttled	99%

PC Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-6200U 135,462 User benchmarks, average bench 41% U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (48^th percentile)	43.4% Average	Memory 60.8 1-Core 78.8 2-Core 131 53% 90.2 Pts	4-Core 142 8-Core 219 22% 181 Pts	64-Core 211 13% 211 Pts
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 43.4% Great: 55%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 950M 38,813 User benchmarks, average bench 14% Device(1B0A 2286) ≥ 4GB Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 23.21.13.9077 Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	16.3% Very poor	Lighting 21.9 Reflection 15.7 Parallax 16.5 18% 18 fps	MRender 12.1 Gravity 21 Splatting 15.6 13% 16.2 fps
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 16.3% Great: 16%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
S11-256G-PHISON-SSD 256GB 324 User benchmarks, average bench 63% 59GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFD00.3 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 2354 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 248 (A8) Unknown 100 100 0 (AA) Unknown 90 90 174 (AD) Unknown 100 100 1835089 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 9 (C2) HDA temperature 67 67 141736083489 (DA) Unknown 100 100 0 (E7) Temperature 100 100 97 (F1) Unknown 100 100 3579	38.7% Below average	Read 474 Write 35.6 Mixed 370 64% 293 MB/s	4K Read 0.06 4K Write 29.3 4K Mixed 8.97 27% 12.8 MB/s	DQ Read 236 DQ Write 167 DQ Mixed 10.5 60% 138 MB/s
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 38.7% Great: 83%
Toshiba MQ01ABD100M 1TB 6,695 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 306GB free Firmware: AX1P1A Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 100 100 1885 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 262 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 95 95 2336 (0A) Spinup retry count 105 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 246 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 2 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 4 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 97 97 33804 (C2) HDA temperature 100 100 214749085739 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (DC) Disk shift 100 100 0 (DE) Loaded hours 99 99 528 (DF) Load/unload retry count 100 100 0 (E0) Load friction 100 100 0 (E2) Load-in time 100 100 262 (F0) Head flying hours 100 100 0	39.2% Below average	Read 70.7 Write 66.1 Mixed 69.7 52% 68.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.36 4K Write 0.95 4K Mixed 0.14 48% 0.48 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 39.2% Great: 61%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMT41GS6DFR8A-PB 1x8GB 6,821 User benchmarks, average bench 27% 1 of 2 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing below potential (40^th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	26.5% Poor	MC Read 8.9 MC Write 9.6 MC Mixed 8.5 26% 9 GB/s	SC Read 8.5 SC Write 8.7 SC Mixed 6.6 23% 7.93 GB/s	Latency 125 32% 125 ns
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 26.5% Great: 33%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Medion Erazer P7643 MD60397

Performance Results

PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Feedback

PC Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)