HP p6-2303esm

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics3.77% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (43%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP p6-2303esm  (all builds)
MotherboardFoxconn 2ADA
Memory3.3 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120914
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateFeb 15 '18 at 11:03
Run Duration94 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU 43%

 PC Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-3220-$79
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
59.3% Above average
Memory 85.3
1-Core 68.8
2-Core 120
58% 91.5 Pts
4-Core 192
8-Core 214
27% 203 Pts
64-Core 224
14% 224 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 59.3%
Great: 62%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 710
MSI(1462 8C93) 2GB
CLim: 954 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 390.77
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
3.77% Terrible
Lighting 4.47
Reflection 4.35
Parallax 4.09
4% 4.3 fps
MRender 4.19
Gravity 3.9
Splatting 6.13
4% 4.74 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.77%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hitachi HDS721010CLA630 1TB
53GB free (System drive)
Firmware: JP4OA41A Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
54.3% Above average
Read 84.8
Write 105
Mixed 96.8
72% 95.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.45
4K Write 1.41
4K Mixed 0.22
70% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 54.3%
Great: 76%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B5773CH0-CK0 Hynix HMT351U6CFR8C-PB 6GB
1600, 1600 MHz
2048, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
51.9% Above average
MC Read 18.9
MC Write 19
MC Mixed 16.7
52% 18.2 GB/s
SC Read 13.3
SC Write 14.9
SC Mixed 14.4
41% 14.2 GB/s
Latency 71.8
56% 71.8 ns
Poor: 21%
This bench: 51.9%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback