Asrock X99E-ITX/ac

Performance Results


Gaming 23% Surfboard	Desktop 66% Battle cruiser	Workstation 23% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	32.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	74.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asrock X99E-ITX/ac (all builds)
Memory	19.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20160809
Uptime	0.8 Days
Run Date	Feb 15 '18 at 06:05
Run Duration	242 Seconds
Run User	ARE-User
Background CPU	4%

PC Performing as expected (41^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-2630 v4 1,239 User benchmarks, average bench 63% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 20 threads Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.25 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)	60.2% Good	Memory 66 1-Core 76.2 2-Core 144 56% 95.5 Pts	4-Core 292 8-Core 594 52% 443 Pts	64-Core 1,010 62% 1,010 Pts
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 60.2% Great: 75%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro M4000 9,043 User benchmarks, average bench 32% Nvidia(10DE 1153) ≥ 4GB CLim: 772 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 390.77 Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	32.5% Below average	Lighting 40.4 Reflection 39.3 Parallax 36 33% 38.6 fps	MRender 43.5 Gravity 35.7 Splatting 38.2 32% 39.1 fps
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 32.5% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 EVO M.2 500GB 25,072 User benchmarks, average bench 110% 100GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT21B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 1362 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 130 (B1) Unknown 99 99 14 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 45 32 55 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 38 (F1) Unknown 99 99 16276024344	74.1% Very good	Read 501 Write 399 Mixed 409 97% 436 MB/s	4K Read 24 4K Write 30.6 4K Mixed 17.3 75% 23.9 MB/s	DQ Read 180 DQ Write 146 DQ Mixed 67.4 76% 131 MB/s
Poor: 79% ↑ This bench: 74.1% Great: 131%
WD WD10JPLX-00MBPT0 1TB 11,708 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 37GB free Firmware: 01.01H01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 121 121 98784247810 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 187 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 97 97 1383 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 146 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 7 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 99 99 14886 (C2) HDA temperature 153 153 227634577447 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (DF) Load/unload retry count 100 100 0	40.2% Average	Read 72.3 Write 67.7 Mixed 68.8 52% 69.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.69 4K Write 1.13 4K Mixed 0.2 73% 0.68 MB/s
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 40.2% Great: 75%
WD My Passport 25E2 4TB 31,793 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 2TB free, PID 25e2 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing as expected (47^th percentile)	36.9% Below average	Read 102 Write 86.6 Mixed 29.5 85% 72.6 MB/s	4K Read 1.28 4K Write 0.96 4K Mixed 0.35 49% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 36.9% Great: 59%
WD My Passport 0827 1TB 5,337 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 812GB free, PID 0827 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)	36.1% Below average	Read 104 Write 90 Mixed 54.6 100% 82.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.55 4K Write 0.41 4K Mixed 0.23 24% 0.4 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 36.1% Great: 45%
WD My Passport 1TB 12,840 User benchmarks, average bench 29% 516GB free, PID 0748 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)	35.2% Below average	Read 84.5 Write 84 Mixed 71.4 102% 80 MB/s	4K Read 0.56 4K Write 1.48 4K Mixed 0.23 60% 0.76 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 35.2% Great: 45%
Toshiba External USB 3.0 500GB 2,264 User benchmarks, average bench 27% 71GB free, PID a007 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing as expected (40^th percentile)	22.8% Poor	Read 64.9 Write 56.7 Mixed 54.2 74% 58.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.42 4K Write 0.31 4K Mixed 0.2 19% 0.31 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 22.8% Great: 43%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 18ASF2G72PZ-2G3B1 2x16GB 77 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 2 of 4 slots used 32GB RIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	41.2% Average	MC Read 15.6 MC Write 14.6 MC Mixed 14.9 43% 15 GB/s	SC Read 6.6 SC Write 12.9 SC Mixed 10 28% 9.83 GB/s	Latency 111 36% 111 ns
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 41.2% Great: 72%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X99E-ITX/ac Builds (Compare 156 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 85%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 87%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 76%

Battleship

Motherboard: Asrock X99E-ITX/ac - $371

CPU
Core i7-6800KIntel $103Bench 81%, 50,196 samples	41x
Core i7-5820KIntel $130Bench 77%, 101,694 samples	39x
Core i7-5930KIntel $70Bench 80%, 34,039 samples	15x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	16x
GTX 980-TiNvidia $560Bench 79%, 214,030 samples	13x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	10x

SSD
950 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsung $625Bench 223%, 54,978 samples	9x
850 Pro 256GBSamsung $125Bench 102%, 141,929 samples	6x
MZ7LN256HCHP-000L7 256GBSamsungBench 81%, 7,649 samples	6x

RAM
Ripjaws V DDR4 2400 C15 2x16GBG.SKILL $70Bench 72%, 6,515 samples	12x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2133 C13 2x16GBCorsairBench 69%, 3,147 samples	9x
Fury DDR4 2133 C14 2x8GBHyperX $125Bench 73%, 59,072 samples	8x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 46% - Average

Total price: $1,569

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16