Mingying X79 Zeus Edition

Performance Results


Gaming 39% Jet ski	Desktop 78% Battleship	Workstation 33% Sail boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	45.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	108% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Very high background CPU (91%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 5 years ago.

System	Mingying X79 Zeus Edition (all builds)
Motherboard	MingYing X79 Zeus Edition
Memory	8.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20161107
Uptime	0.5 Days
Run Date	Feb 15 '18 at 02:35
Run Duration	134 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	91%

Watch Gameplay: Vega-56 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-1620 0-$345 17,464 User benchmarks, average bench 70% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz Performing as expected (56^th percentile)	69.9% Good	Memory 86.8 1-Core 89.3 2-Core 164 68% 113 Pts	4-Core 288 8-Core 467 46% 377 Pts	64-Core 483 30% 483 Pts
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 69.9% Great: 77%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX Vega-56-$170 92,053 User benchmarks, average bench 78% AMD(1002 6B76) CLim: 1538 MHz, MLim: 800 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 18.1.1 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	45.1% Average	Lighting 57.4 Reflection 40.2 Parallax 78.4 47% 58.7 fps	MRender 40.9 Gravity 52.9 Splatting 56.8 42% 50.2 fps
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 45.1% Great: 85%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial M550 256GB-$152 8,333 User benchmarks, average bench 90% 57GB free (System drive) Firmware: MU01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 1 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 8796 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 1158 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 90 90 309 (AE) Unknown 100 100 106 (B4) Unknown 0 0 2159 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 13578 (C2) HDA temperature 73 50 214749085723 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 16 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 6 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 90 90 10 (CE) Flying height 100 100 0 (D2) Unknown 100 100 0 (F6) Unknown 100 100 35039011388 (F7) Unknown 100 100 1105532343 (F8) Unknown 100 100 4038971221	108% Outstanding	Read 520 Write 481 Mixed 492 111% 498 MB/s	4K Read 31.3 4K Write 101 4K Mixed 36 147% 56 MB/s	DQ Read 327 DQ Write 281 DQ Mixed 68.3 116% 225 MB/s
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 108% Great: 113%
Seagate Barracuda Green 2TB-$95 81,608 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 1TB free Firmware: CC45 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 117 99 408 (03) Spinup time 92 92 0 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 658 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 62 60 4296670657 (09) Power-on hours count 95 95 4670 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 552 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 4295032833 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 74 49 453640218 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 134 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 708 (C2) HDA temperature 26 51 34359738394 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 21 9 408 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 -126783139605849 (F1) Unknown 100 253 403997032 (F2) Unknown 100 253 3081051862	63.7% Good	Read 113 Write 109 Mixed 112 84% 111 MB/s	4K Read 0.77 4K Write 0.92 4K Mixed 0.59 115% 0.76 MB/s
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 63.7% Great: 75%
WD Green 1TB (2011)-$64 143,477 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 69GB free Firmware: 1A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (81^st percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 123 122 4825 (04) Start/Stop count 98 98 2391 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 75 75 18966 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 2374 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 259 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 102 102 295769 (C2) HDA temperature 118 93 25 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	76.2% Very good	Read 127 Write 139 Mixed 128 99% 131 MB/s	4K Read 1.05 4K Write 2.8 4K Mixed 0.23 122% 1.36 MB/s
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 76.2% Great: 85%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown CL9-9-9 D3-16 F3-1600C9-4GA CL9-9-9 D3-16 F3-1600C9-4GA 16GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	88.4% Excellent	MC Read 32.7 MC Write 38.4 MC Mixed 32.9 99% 34.7 GB/s	SC Read 13.9 SC Write 12.9 SC Mixed 11.5 36% 12.8 GB/s	Latency 70.7 57% 70.7 ns
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 88.4% Great: 88%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16