User System

Performance Results

Benchmarks - excluding HDD
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.2%, this CPUs suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics16.7% is a below average 3D score (GTX 1070 = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive74.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Run History
SystemRazer Razer Blade Pro
MotherboardGigabyte Blade
Memory4.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130520
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 15 '18 at 02:17
Run Duration100 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Single core Quad core Multi core
Intel Core i7-4700HQ-$370
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
62.2% Good
SC Int 91.1
SC Float 90.1
SC Mixed 90.6
72% 90.6 Pts
QC Int 285
QC Float 303
QC Mixed 298
67% 296 Pts
MC Int 452
MC Float 483
MC Mixed 470
70% 469 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 62.2%
Great: 70%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 765M
Device(1A58 6748) 2GB
Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 10.18.13.5354
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
16.7% Very poor
Lighting 49.9
Reflection 39.5
Parallax 61.1
17% 50.2 fps
MRender 36.4
Gravity 46.8
Splatting 33.7
17% 39 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 16.7%
Great: 20%
Drive Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZMTD512HAGL-00000 512GB
277GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DXT4200Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
74.1% Very good
Read 507
Write 234
Mixed 233
71% 325 MB/s
4K Read 26.4
4K Write 68.8
4K Mixed 17
98% 37.4 MB/s
DQ Read 309
DQ Write 177
DQ Mixed 38.1
83% 175 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 74.1%
Great: 74%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Crucial CT51264BF160BJ.M8F 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
50.8% Above average
MC Read 18.7
MC Write 18.3
MC Mixed 15.4
50% 17.5 GB/s
SC Read 12.5
SC Write 16.5
SC Mixed 15.5
42% 14.8 GB/s
Latency 68.8
58% 68.8 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 50.8%
Great: 56%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i7-8700K $330Nvidia GTX 1070 $380Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $95
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 $150Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $240Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $120
Intel Core i5-8600K $240AMD RX 480 $280Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $163
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $44Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $155SanDisk Extreme 64GB $80
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $901SanDisk Extreme 32GB $30
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $175SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $12
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback