Asus F5SL

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 16%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (22nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 78 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 21.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics0.49% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive31.4% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory3GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 3GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (36%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago.
SystemAsus F5SL  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK F5SL
Memory1.8 GB free of 3 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1280 x 800 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20080729
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 14 '18 at 20:09
Run Duration407 Seconds
Run User SVK-User
Background CPU 36%

 PC Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Duo T5450-$89
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.65 GHz
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
21.2% Poor
Memory 38.9
1-Core 13.7
2-Core 16.6
18% 23.1 Pts
4-Core 21.1
8-Core 30.1
3% 25.6 Pts
64-Core 29.1
2% 29.1 Pts
Poor: 18%
This bench: 21.2%
Great: 37%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
ATI Mobility Radeon HD 3400
Asus(1043 19E2) 256MB
Driver: aticfx32.dll Ver. 8.970.100.1100
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
0.49% Terrible
Lighting 0.67
Reflection 1.27
Parallax 0.38
0% 0.77 fps
MRender 0.81
Gravity 0.07
Splatting 0.57
0% 0.48 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.49%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial BX300 240GB-$43
133GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M2CR010 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
31.4% Below average
Read 124
Write 88
Mixed 80.6
22% 97.6 MB/s
4K Read 22.3
4K Write 24.7
4K Mixed 14.2
65% 20.4 MB/s
DQ Read 27.1
DQ Write 46.1
DQ Mixed 15.3
18% 29.5 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 31.4%
Great: 114%
WD My Passport Essential 500GB
383GB free, PID 070a
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
9.95% Terrible
Read 22.2
Write 17.7
Mixed 11.1
20% 17 MB/s
4K Read 0.08
4K Write 0.93
4K Mixed 0.002
32% 0.34 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 9.95%
Great: 18%
SDXC Card 64GB
59GB free, PID null
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
11.7% Very poor
Read 21.3
Write 15.3
Mixed 18.9
23% 18.5 MB/s
4K Read 3
4K Write 1.49
4K Mixed 0.76
88% 1.75 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 11.7%
Great: 41%
TDK LoR 2 in 1 Micro 64GB
58GB free, PID 0720
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
9.08% Terrible
Read 22.1
Write 15.4
Mixed 10.4
19% 16 MB/s
4K Read 1.65
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.68
53% 1.01 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 9.08%
Great: 9%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 3GB
null MHz
2048, 1024 MB
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
7.95% Terrible
MC Read 3.4
MC Write 2.1
MC Mixed 2.1
7% 2.53 GB/s
SC Read 1.6
SC Write 1.7
SC Mixed 1.7
5% 1.67 GB/s
Latency 208
19% 208 ns
Poor: 8%
This bench: 7.95%
Great: 23%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical F5SL Builds (Compare 24 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 32%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Asus F5SL

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 42% - Average Total price: $99
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback