HP ENVY 15 Notebook PC

Performance Results

Benchmarks - excluding GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (8th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 92 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 21.3%, this CPUs suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Very high background CPU (34%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. Find active processes with Windows task manager (CTRL+SHIFT+ESC).
Run History
11 days ago, 11 days ago.
SystemHP ENVY 15 Notebook PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 229C
Memory3.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170405
Uptime7 Days
Run DateFeb 14 '18 at 19:45
Run Duration88 Seconds
Run User MAR-User
Background CPU 34%

 PC Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Single core Quad core Multi core
Intel Core i5-5200U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
21.3% Poor
SC Int 69.3
SC Float 77.3
SC Mixed 49.9
52% 65.5 Pts
QC Int 60.8
QC Float 63.3
QC Mixed 71.7
15% 65.3 Pts
MC Int 136
MC Float 154
MC Mixed 137
21% 143 Pts
Poor: 23%
This bench: 21.3%
Great: 45%
Drive Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
HGST Travelstar 5K1000 2.5" 1TB
206GB free
Firmware: JA0OA560 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
SYSTEM NCQ 5400 RPM 4KALIGNED S.M.A.R.T
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
31.9% Below average
Read 57.4
Write 53.9
Mixed 53.8
41% 55 MB/s
4K Read 0.14
4K Write 0.2
4K Mixed 0.11
22% 0.15 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 31.9%
Great: 57%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Samsung M471B1G73QH0-YK0 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
23.9% Poor
MC Read 6.2
MC Write 8.3
MC Mixed 8
21% 7.5 GB/s
SC Read 5.1
SC Write 3.6
SC Mixed 5.4
13% 4.7 GB/s
Latency 62.9
64% 62.9 ns
Poor: 19%
This bench: 23.9%
Great: 33%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical ENVY 15 Notebook PC Builds (Compare 2,830 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 34%
Sail boat

System: HP ENVY 15 Notebook PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $359
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i7-8700K $330Nvidia GTX 1070 $430Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $88
Intel Core i7-7700K $290Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $285Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $150
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 $170AMD RX 480 $400Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $146
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $45Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $184SanDisk Extreme 64GB $44
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $79G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $931SanDisk Extreme 32GB $23
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB $42Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $206SanDisk Extreme 16GB $18
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback