PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (19th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 81 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 3.67% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 156% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files. |
Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | Gigabyte Z170X-UD3 |
Motherboard | Gigabyte GA-Z170X-UD3-CF (all builds) |
Memory | 4.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz |
Display | 1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors, , |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20180111 |
Uptime | 1.2 Days |
Run Date | Feb 14 '18 at 19:25 |
Run Duration | 118 Seconds |
Run User | USA-User |
Background CPU | 100% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i5-6400T
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
|
60.6%
Good
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 2252 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 390.77
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
3.67%
Terrible
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 960 EVO 250GB
449GB free
Firmware: 3B7QCXE7
|
168%
Outstanding
|
|||
Samsung 960 EVO 500GB
153GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B7QCXE7
|
156%
Outstanding
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Crucial BLS4G4D240FSB.8FBD 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (17th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
68.9%
Good
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i7-6700KIntel $180Bench 81%, 588,978 samples | 244x |
Core i5-6600KIntel $81Bench 72%, 342,244 samples | 179x |
Core i7-6700Intel $180Bench 72%, 282,363 samples | 73x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples | 94x |
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 56x |
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 52x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 94% - Outstanding | Total price: $452 |