Asrock H61M-VG4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics4.66% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive53.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock H61M-VG4  (all builds)
Memory3.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors, 1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20130712
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateFeb 14 '18 at 09:56
Run Duration404 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU 19%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2400-$250
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
65.8% Good
Memory 78.4
1-Core 83.2
2-Core 161
63% 107 Pts
4-Core 308
8-Core 312
41% 310 Pts
64-Core 310
19% 310 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 65.8%
Great: 70%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)
ASRock(1849 0102) 2.2GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.2875
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
1.02% Terrible
Lighting 1.1
Reflection 1.35
Parallax 0.97
1% 1.14 fps
MRender 1.62
Gravity 0.77
Splatting 2
1% 1.46 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.02%
Great: 1%
AMD Radeon R7 240
PwrHis(1787 2000) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 16.12.1
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
4.66% Terrible
Lighting 5.4
Reflection 6.54
Parallax 6.47
4% 6.14 fps
MRender 6.43
Gravity 5.27
Splatting 6.96
5% 6.22 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 4.66%
Great: 5%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk SSD Plus 240GB-$28
66GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 30RL Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below potential (38th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
53.4% Above average
Read 228
Write 235
Mixed 163
47% 209 MB/s
4K Read 25.4
4K Write 66
4K Mixed 6.63
82% 32.7 MB/s
DQ Read 142
DQ Write 179
DQ Mixed 7.66
48% 109 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 53.4%
Great: 86%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$32
466GB free
Firmware: JC45 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
68.2% Good
Read 124
Write 114
Mixed 106
86% 115 MB/s
4K Read 0.71
4K Write 1.99
4K Mixed 0.66
139% 1.12 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 68.2%
Great: 70%
Seagate Expansion 500GB
432GB free, PID 231a
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
16.1% Very poor
Read 41.4
Write 33.7
Mixed 35.7
46% 36.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.48
4K Write 0.86
4K Mixed 0.2
38% 0.51 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 16.1%
Great: 44%
SanDisk Cruzer Edge 8GB
5GB free, PID 556b
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
10.7% Very poor
Read 33.1
Write 4.12
Mixed 6.76
13% 14.7 MB/s
4K Read 3.7
4K Write 1.34
4K Mixed 1.1
97% 2.05 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 10.7%
Great: 13%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung V-GeN D3V8GL16A8R 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1067 MHz
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
21.7% Poor
MC Read 6.7
MC Write 6.9
MC Mixed 6.4
19% 6.67 GB/s
SC Read 6.6
SC Write 6.6
SC Mixed 6.4
19% 6.53 GB/s
Latency 83.5
48% 83.5 ns
Poor: 21%
This bench: 21.7%
Great: 34%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H61M-VG4 Builds (Compare 433 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock H61M-VG4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 91% - Outstanding Total price: $146
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback