User System

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 26%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 32%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 31%, this CPUs suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics38.5% is a below average 3D score (GTX 1070 = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive25.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 8 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (38%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. Find active processes with Windows task manager (CTRL+SHIFT+ESC).
Run History
3 months ago, 1 month ago.
SystemMEGAWARE H55H-CM
MotherboardMEGAWARE MW-H55H-CM
Memory5.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20100518
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateFeb 14 '18 at 04:14
Run Duration223 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU 38%

 PC Performing below expectations (24th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Single core Quad core Multi core
Intel Core i3 530-$136
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.95 GHz
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
31% Below average
SC Int 52.5
SC Float 58.4
SC Mixed 57.7
45% 56.2 Pts
QC Int 130
QC Float 143
QC Mixed 136
31% 136 Pts
MC Int 145
MC Float 161
MC Mixed 148
23% 151 Pts
Poor: 28%
This bench: 31%
Great: 44%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
AMD R9 270X-$199
Sapphire(174B E272) 2GB
CLim: 1150 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 18.1.1
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
38.5% Below average
Lighting 116
Reflection 96.2
Parallax 158
41% 123 fps
MRender 67.2
Gravity 99.1
Splatting 96.7
37% 87.7 fps
Poor: 31%
This bench: 38.5%
Great: 39%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Kingston SUV300S37A120G 120GB
29GB free
Firmware: SAFM11.K Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
SYSTEM NCQ 4KALIGNED SSD TRIM S.M.A.R.T
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
25.6% Poor
Read 196
Write 32
Mixed 158
28% 129 MB/s
4K Read 16
4K Write 29.2
4K Mixed 6.51
48% 17.2 MB/s
DQ Read 20.8
DQ Write 68.5
DQ Mixed 11.7
18% 33.7 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 25.6%
Great: 91%
Seagate ST320LM001 HN-M320MBB 320GB
222GB free
Firmware: 2AR20002 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
NCQ 5400 RPM 4KALIGNED S.M.A.R.T
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
6.23% Terrible
Read 10.9
Write 10.6
Mixed 15
9% 12.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.23
4K Write 0.76
4K Mixed 0.16
42% 0.38 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 6.23%
Great: 50%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Unknown 8GB
0, 0, 0 MHz
4096, 2048, 2048 MB
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
26.3% Poor
MC Read 9.1
MC Write 7.8
MC Mixed 11
27% 9.3 GB/s
SC Read 6.2
SC Write 5.7
SC Mixed 6.6
18% 6.17 GB/s
Latency 123
32% 123 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 26.3%
Great: 51%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 $169Nvidia GTX 1070 $447Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $100
Intel Core i7-8700K $325Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $295Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $137
Intel Core i7-7700K $290AMD RX 480 $330Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $163
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $45Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $180SanDisk Extreme 64GB $41
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $960SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $60HyperX Fury DDR4 2133 C14 2x8GB $226SanDisk Extreme 16GB $20
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback