Samsung NC10

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 15.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
MemoryThe RAM on this system should be upgraded to at least 2GB although on 32bit systems 1GB will suffice as a bare minimum.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (45%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemSamsung NC10  (all builds)
MotherboardSAMSUNG NC10
Memory0.1 GB free of 1 GB @ 0.5 GHz
Display1024 x 600 - 32 Bit colores, 1024 x 600 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20090908
Uptime14.9 Days
Run DateFeb 14 '18 at 01:28
Run Duration386 Seconds
Run User MEX-User
Background CPU 45%

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Atom N270
U2E1, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.6 GHz, turbo 1.6 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
15.7% Very poor
Memory 29.8
1-Core 5.7
2-Core 10
12% 15.2 Pts
4-Core 11.3
8-Core 9.3
1% 10.3 Pts
64-Core 8.6
0% 8.6 Pts
Poor: 12%
This bench: 15.7%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD WD800BEVS-22RST0 80GB
56GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 04.01G04 Max speed: SATA 1.0 150 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
23.8% Poor
Read 41.2
Write 41.8
Mixed 32.6
29% 38.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.05
4K Write 0.2
4K Mixed 0.25
33% 0.16 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 23.8%
Great: 27%
Kingston DT Micro 8GB
6GB free, PID 168a
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
3.87% Terrible
Read 16.2
Write 3.66
Mixed 4.28
8% 8.05 MB/s
4K Read 2.99
4K Write 0.006
4K Mixed 0.006
12% 1 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.87%
Great: 6%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1x1GB
1 of 2 slots used
1GB SODIMM DDR2
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
5.08% Terrible
MC Read 1
MC Write 2.5
MC Mixed 1.6
5% 1.7 GB/s
SC Read 0.2
SC Write 0.2
SC Mixed 0.1
0% 0.17 GB/s
Latency 256
16% 256 ns
Poor: 4%
This bench: 5.08%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback