User System

Performance Results

Benchmarks - excluding SSD
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 17%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 9.53%, this CPUs suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics0.07% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 8 years and 7 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (88%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. Find active processes with Windows task manager (CTRL+SHIFT+ESC).
Run History
9 days ago, 9 days ago.
MotherboardPCCHIPS A13G
Memory1.2 GB free of 2 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20061005
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateFeb 13 '18 at 23:36
Run Duration213 Seconds
Run User VEN-User
Background CPU 88%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Single core Quad core Multi core
AMD Sempron 3000+-$40
Socket M2 , 1 CPU, 1 cores, 1 threads
Base clock 1.6 GHz
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
9.53% Terrible
SC Int 34.4
SC Float 23
SC Mixed 26.9
22% 28.1 Pts
QC Int 33.3
QC Float 23.6
QC Mixed 27.5
6% 28.1 Pts
MC Int 33.8
MC Float 23
MC Mixed 27.5
4% 28.1 Pts
Poor: 5%
This bench: 9.53%
Great: 11%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 6100
Elitegroup(1019 2604) 256MB
Driver: nvd3dum.dll Ver. 8.15.11.8593
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
0.07% Terrible
Lighting 0.4
Reflection 0.4
Parallax 0.8
0% 0.53 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.07%
Great: 0%
Drive Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Maxtor 6L080L0 82GB
57GB free
Firmware: BAJ41G20 Max speed: UDMA 133 133 MB/s
SYSTEM 4KALIGNED S.M.A.R.T
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
24.7% Poor
Read 43.6
Write 42.6
Mixed 40.6
32% 42.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.21
4K Write 0.86
4K Mixed 0.14
40% 0.4 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 24.7%
Great: 31%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Unknown 1x2GB
1 of 4 slots used
2GB DIMM
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
12.4% Very poor
MC Read 3.9
MC Write 4
MC Mixed 3.5
11% 3.8 GB/s
SC Read 4
SC Write 3.9
SC Mixed 3.4
11% 3.77 GB/s
Latency 149
27% 149 ns
Poor: 8%
This bench: 12.4%
Great: 29%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i7-8700K $330Nvidia GTX 1070 $430Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $88
Intel Core i7-7700K $290Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $285Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $146
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 $170AMD RX 480 $400Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $125
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $45Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $185SanDisk Extreme 64GB $44
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $79G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $975SanDisk Extreme 32GB $23
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB $42Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $206SanDisk Extreme 16GB $18
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback