Asrock Z87 Killer

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 49%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 38%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics63.9% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (26%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock Z87 Killer  (all builds)
Memory19.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150428
Uptime2 Days
Run DateFeb 13 '18 at 20:24
Run Duration704 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 26%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4670K-$62
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
76.8% Very good
Memory 82.4
1-Core 110
2-Core 215
77% 136 Pts
4-Core 412
8-Core 412
55% 412 Pts
64-Core 414
26% 414 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 76.8%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 2012 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 390.77
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
63.9% Good
Lighting 80.6
Reflection 81
Parallax 69.7
66% 77.1 fps
MRender 71.2
Gravity 73.9
Splatting 75.7
60% 73.6 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 63.9%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
77GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 72% Great: 124%
Toshiba X300 5TB-$125
520GB free
Firmware: FP2A Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
66.3% Good
Read 121
Write 109
Mixed 79.4
77% 103 MB/s
4K Read 1.32
4K Write 1.99
4K Mixed 0.25
120% 1.19 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 66.3%
Great: 109%
Seagate ST3250310AS 250GB-$44
92GB free
Firmware: 4.ADA Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
43% Average
Read 59.3
Write 90.4
Mixed 84.1
59% 77.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.68
4K Write 1.18
4K Mixed 0.25
78% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 43%
Great: 54%
SanDisk Ultra Flair USB 3.0 64GB-$7
57GB free, PID 5591, SanDisk Ultra Flair USB 3.0 64GB
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
35% Below average
Read 168
Write 26.3
Mixed 43.3
74% 79 MB/s
4K Read 4.68
4K Write 1.24
4K Mixed 0.29
70% 2.07 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 35%
Great: 40%
USB DISK 2.0 8GB
7GB free, PID 4200, EMTEC 8 GB Color Mix USB 2.0 Flash Drive
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
4.65% Terrible
Read 16
Write 4.28
Mixed 4.63
8% 8.32 MB/s
4K Read 5.82
4K Write 0.005
4K Mixed 0.005
22% 1.94 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 4.65%
Great: 9%
SEAGATE ST650211USB 5GB
5GB free, PID 0888, Seagate Pocket 5GB USB 2.0
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
3.4% Terrible
Read 8.28
Write 8.26
Mixed 9.13
11% 8.56 MB/s
4K Read 0.25
4K Write 0.11
4K Mixed 0.08
7% 0.15 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.4%
Great: 3%
SanDisk Cruzer Micro 0GB
0GB free, PID 5151, Sandisk 256MB Cruzer Micro
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
4.79% Terrible
Read 12.7
Write 6.52
Mixed 8.52
11% 9.27 MB/s
4K Read 4.8
4K Write 0.13
4K Mixed 0.12
26% 1.68 MB/s
Poor: 1%
This bench: 4.79%
Great: 5%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown BLS8G3D1609DS1S00. Kingston KHX1600C10D3/8G 1315 BLS8G3D1609DS1S00. Kingston KHX1600C10D3/8G 32GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (27th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
57.1% Above average
MC Read 19.3
MC Write 22.5
MC Mixed 18.5
57% 20.1 GB/s
SC Read 12.7
SC Write 19.3
SC Mixed 17.9
48% 16.6 GB/s
Latency 76.2
52% 76.2 ns
Poor: 55%
This bench: 57.1%
Great: 63%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z87 Killer Builds (Compare 421 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 33%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asrock Z87 Killer - $216

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 84% - Excellent Total price: $475
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback