Performance Results


Gaming 8% Tree trunk	Desktop 63% Destroyer	Workstation 7% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	4.18% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	63.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 16GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

PC Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon X5550 1,065 User benchmarks, average bench 67% CPU0 PROCESSOR, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.65 GHz Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)	68.8% Good	Memory 88.3 1-Core 73.7 2-Core 151 63% 104 Pts	4-Core 286 8-Core 289 38% 288 Pts	64-Core 289 18% 289 Pts
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 68.8% Great: 72%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro FX 1800 6,394 User benchmarks, average bench 4% Nvidia(10DE 062C) 768MB Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 9.18.13.4192 Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)	4.18% Terrible	Lighting 5.13 Reflection 7.5 Parallax 1.69 4% 4.77 fps	MRender 7.57 Gravity 3.53 Splatting 4.61 4% 5.24 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 4.18% Great: 4%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Pro 512GB-$210 68,849 User benchmarks, average bench 102% 203GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXM0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below potential (3^rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 2479 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 222 (B1) Unknown 99 99 13 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 74 65 26 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 19 (F1) Unknown 99 99 8659376607	63.3% Good	Read 236 Write 258 Mixed 231 54% 242 MB/s	4K Read 18 4K Write 62.4 4K Mixed 29.8 98% 36.7 MB/s	DQ Read 188 DQ Write 139 DQ Mixed 131 107% 153 MB/s
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 63.3% Great: 124%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 2TB 3,115 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 15GB free, PID 0200 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	13.3% Very poor	Read 27.8 Write 26.2 Mixed 27.1 35% 27 MB/s	4K Read 0.27 4K Write 1.13 4K Mixed 0.16 45% 0.52 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 13.3% Great: 44%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown ID:80 2C 18JSF25672AY-1G4D1 ID:80 2C 18JSF25672AY-1G4D1 ID:80 2C 18JSF25672AY-1G4D1 ID:01 98 9965525-033.A00LF ID:80 2C 18JSF25672AY-1G4D1 ID:01 98 9965525-033.A00LF 50GB 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 2048, 2048, 2048, 4096, 2048, 4096, 34816 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	46.9% Average	MC Read 17.3 MC Write 14.7 MC Mixed 16.9 47% 16.3 GB/s	SC Read 11.7 SC Write 12 SC Mixed 13.3 35% 12.3 GB/s	Latency 69.2 58% 69.2 ns

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 10%

Tree trunk

Desktop 60%

Destroyer

Workstation 10%

Tree trunk

CPU
CPU: Intel Xeon X56501stBench 64%, 7,756 samples	318x
CPU: Intel Xeon X56751stBench 68%, 4,275 samples	188x
CPU: Intel Xeon X56701stBench 67%, 4,676 samples	179x

SSD
WDS100T2B0A-00SM50 1TBWDCBench 98%, 74,123 samples	38x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	34x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	34x

RAM
ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 58GBUnknownBench 50%, 261 samples	23x
ID:80 2C 36JSZF51272PZ1G4F1 ID:80 2C 36JSZF51272PZ1G4F1 ID:80 2C 36JSZF51272PZ1G4F1 ID:80 2C 36JSZF51272PZ1G4F1 ID:80 2C 36JSZF51272PZ1G4F1 ID:80 2C 36JSZF51272PZ1G4F1 ID:80 2C 36JSZF51272PZ1G4F1 JE... 82GBUnknownBench 53%, 67 samples	19x
ID:80 AD HMT31GR7BFR4C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT31GR7BFR4C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT31GR7BFR4C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT31GR7BFR4C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT31GR7BFR4C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT31GR7BFR4C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT31GR7BFR4C-H9 ID:80 AD H... 130GBUnknownBench 53%, 67 samples	15x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16