Asus M5A97 EVO R2.0

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics26.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus M5A97 EVO R2.0  (all builds)
Memory10.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150212
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 12 '18 at 16:40
Run Duration179 Seconds
Run User ARG-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8350-$130
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
70% Very good
Memory 91.9
1-Core 70.1
2-Core 140
62% 101 Pts
4-Core 261
8-Core 417
42% 339 Pts
64-Core 413
26% 413 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 70%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 7950-$290
XFX(1682 3221) 3GB
CLim: 900 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 17.1.1
Performing below potential (25th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
26.2% Poor
Lighting 39.7
Reflection 28.5
Parallax 48.8
32% 39 fps
MRender 8.33
Gravity 0.17
Splatting 35.5
14% 14.7 fps
Poor: 25%
This bench: 26.2%
Great: 32%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
4GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 72% Great: 124%
Toshiba MK2565GSX 250GB
230GB free
Firmware: GJ003A Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
26.8% Poor
Read 35
Write 58.1
Mixed 45.3
35% 46.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.43
4K Write 1.48
4K Mixed 0.29
78% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 26.8%
Great: 40%
Toshiba MK7559GSXP 750GB-$118
62GB free
Firmware: GN001A Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
29.8% Poor
Read 54.1
Write 49.4
Mixed 50.8
39% 51.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.45
4K Write 1.44
4K Mixed 0.25
73% 0.71 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 29.8%
Great: 56%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$50
17GB free
Firmware: HP33 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
63.8% Good
Read 113
Write 110
Mixed 107
83% 110 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 0.69
4K Mixed 0.21
61% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 63.8%
Great: 114%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
HyperX Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1866 MHz clocked @ 933 MHz
Performing below potential (27th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
52.3% Above average
MC Read 22.7
MC Write 15.4
MC Mixed 18.6
54% 18.9 GB/s
SC Read 10.8
SC Write 8.5
SC Mixed 12.9
31% 10.7 GB/s
Latency 64.2
62% 64.2 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 52.3%
Great: 72%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M5A97 EVO R2.0 Builds (Compare 579 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus M5A97 EVO R2.0 - $166

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 70% - Very good Total price: $512
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback