HP EliteBook 8770w

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics16.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive70.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP EliteBook 8770w  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 176C
Memory27.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130715
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateFeb 12 '18 at 10:28
Run Duration322 Seconds
Run User BGR-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3840QM-$549
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
74.4% Very good
Memory 79.4
1-Core 98.9
2-Core 199
71% 126 Pts
4-Core 383
8-Core 495
56% 439 Pts
64-Core 495
31% 495 Pts
Poor: 40%
This bench: 74.4%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K5000M
HP(103C 176C) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 601 MHz, MLim: 750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 385.73
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
16.1% Very poor
Lighting 19.1
Reflection 17.8
Parallax 22.2
16% 19.7 fps
MRender 22.9
Gravity 22.8
Splatting 18.1
17% 21.3 fps
Poor: 14%
This bench: 16.1%
Great: 17%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZ7PD256HAFV-000H7 256GB
61GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DXM05H6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
70.8% Very good
Read 501
Write 188
Mixed 331
75% 340 MB/s
4K Read 23.2
4K Write 62
4K Mixed 22.3
97% 35.8 MB/s
DQ Read 328
DQ Write 128
DQ Mixed 67.4
92% 174 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 70.8%
Great: 108%
HGST Travelstar 5K1000 2.5" 1TB
465GB free
Firmware: JA0OA7J0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
48.8% Average
Read 83.8
Write 86
Mixed 83.8
64% 84.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.53
4K Write 1.47
4K Mixed 0.19
70% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 48.8%
Great: 57%
hp x715w 64GB
14GB free, PID 4940
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
37.4% Below average
Read 115
Write 69.8
Mixed 59.9
95% 81.5 MB/s
4K Read 5.74
4K Write 1.37
4K Mixed 1.09
105% 2.73 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 37.4%
Great: 29%
USB3.0 FLASH DRIVE 16GB
8GB free, PID b128
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
38.5% Below average
Read 232
Write 11.9
Mixed 12.8
64% 85.4 MB/s
4K Read 9.85
4K Write 0.008
4K Mixed 0.002
37% 3.29 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 38.5%
Great: 33%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B1G73QH0-YK0 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR3 1600 MHz
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
53.8% Above average
MC Read 20.5
MC Write 19
MC Mixed 16.4
53% 18.6 GB/s
SC Read 15.9
SC Write 17.3
SC Mixed 18
49% 17.1 GB/s
Latency 81.6
49% 81.6 ns
Poor: 43%
This bench: 53.8%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical EliteBook 8770w Builds (Compare 562 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: HP EliteBook 8770w

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 86% - Excellent Total price: $100
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback