User System

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 109%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 105%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.2%, this CPUs suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics139% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive91.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 9 years old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. Find active processes with Windows task manager (CTRL+SHIFT+ESC).
SystemEVGA Default string
MotherboardEVGA 151-HE-E999
Memory24.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1600 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20160830
Uptime2.1 Days
Run DateFeb 12 '18 at 08:19
Run Duration313 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Single core Quad core Multi core
Intel Core i7-5960X-$950
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3 GHz
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
76.2% Very good
SC Int 64.9
SC Float 75.7
SC Mixed 79
58% 73.2 Pts
QC Int 336
QC Float 365
QC Mixed 342
79% 348 Pts
MC Int 1,257
MC Float 1,338
MC Mixed 1,312
195% 1,302 Pts
Poor: 75%
This bench: 76.2%
Great: 112%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$650
CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 390.77
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
139% Outstanding
Lighting 221
Reflection 294
Parallax 602
111% 373 fps
MRender 263
Gravity 529
Splatting 286
159% 359 fps
Poor: 56%
This bench: 139%
Great: 175%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
OCZ Vertex 4 256GB-$400
111GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.5 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
91.4% Outstanding
Read 477
Write 420
Mixed 346
92% 414 MB/s
4K Read 28.7
4K Write 74.5
4K Mixed 28.6
120% 43.9 MB/s
DQ Read 249
DQ Write 226
DQ Mixed 110
118% 195 MB/s
Poor: 61%
This bench: 91.4%
Great: 106%
WD Red 4TB (2013)-$120
3TB free
Firmware: 82.00A82 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
67.8% Good
Read 142
Write 94.1
Mixed 90.5
81% 109 MB/s
4K Read 0.78
4K Write 0.93
4K Mixed 0.13
64% 0.61 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 67.8%
Great: 98%
Hitachi HDS722020ALA330 2TB-$54
2TB free
Firmware: JKAOA28A Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
69.3% Good
Read 122
Write 120
Mixed 18.5
63% 86.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.74
4K Write 1.33
4K Mixed 0.41
101% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 69.3%
Great: 70%
Samsung Spinpoint F4 2TB-$125
1TB free
Firmware: 1AQ10001 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
39.1% Below average
Read 49.1
Write 87
Mixed 44.7
45% 60.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.38
4K Write 1.69
4K Mixed 0.38
89% 0.82 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 39.1%
Great: 72%
HGST Deskstar NAS 4TB-$140
1TB free
Firmware: MJAOA5E0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
63.7% Good
Read 111
Write 110
Mixed 8.2
55% 76.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.96
4K Write 1.99
4K Mixed 0.22
101% 1.06 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 63.7%
Great: 94%
WD VelociRaptor 300GB-$55
5GB free
Firmware: 04.04V01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
45.7% Average
Read 69.1
Write 89.6
Mixed 26.3
45% 61.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.84
4K Write 2.57
4K Mixed 0.71
161% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 45.7%
Great: 68%
Samsung Flash Drive 32GB
30GB free, PID 1000
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
11.5% Very poor
Read 36.8
Write 18.1
Mixed 21.8
30% 25.6 MB/s
4K Read 3.69
4K Write 0.44
4K Mixed 0.54
47% 1.56 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 11.5%
Great: 46%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
G.SKILL Ripjaws 4 DDR4 2400 C15 4x8GB
4 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
104% Outstanding
MC Read 44.2
MC Write 39.4
MC Mixed 39.5
117% 41 GB/s
SC Read 12.5
SC Write 16.7
SC Mixed 17.7
45% 15.6 GB/s
Latency 76.7
52% 76.7 ns
Poor: 69%
This bench: 104%
Great: 122%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i7-8700K $330Nvidia GTX 1070 $380Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $95
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 $150Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $240Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $120
Intel Core i5-8600K $240AMD RX 480 $280Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $163
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $44Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $155SanDisk Extreme 64GB $80
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $901SanDisk Extreme 32GB $30
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $175SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $12
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback