Hp-pavilion GQ621AA-UUB v7248hk

Performance Results


Gaming 3% Tree trunk	Desktop 42% Speed boat	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 38.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	7.2% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	53.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (99%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Hp-pavilion GQ621AA-UUB v7248hk (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTek Leonite2
Memory	1.3 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit 色彩
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20071030
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Feb 12 '18 at 07:32
Run Duration	140 Seconds
Run User	HKG-User
Background CPU	99%

PC Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 Duo E4500-$130 8,675 User benchmarks, average bench 33% Socket 775, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.95 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (85^th percentile)	38.4% Below average	Memory 68.6 1-Core 28.4 2-Core 58.6 36% 51.9 Pts	4-Core 49.6 8-Core 56.8 7% 53.2 Pts	64-Core 61.9 4% 61.9 Pts
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 38.4% Great: 39%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6670 32,193 User benchmarks, average bench 6% MSI(1462 2530) 1GB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008 Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	7.2% Terrible	Lighting 9.17 Reflection 9.04 Parallax 7.19 8% 8.46 fps	MRender 8.86 Gravity 6.4 Splatting 8.96 7% 8.07 fps
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 7.2% Great: 7%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Dingzhi ZHUANSHU SSD DISK 240GB 379 User benchmarks, average bench 60% 195GB free (System drive) Firmware: Q0810B Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below potential (40^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 17 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 517 (A0) Unknown 100 100 0 (A1) Unknown 100 100 100 (A3) Unknown 100 100 4 (A4) Unknown 100 100 12652 (A5) Unknown 100 100 58 (A6) Unknown 100 100 0 (A7) Unknown 100 100 12 (A8) Unknown 100 100 3000 (A9) Unknown 100 100 100 (AF) Unknown 100 100 0 (B0) Unknown 100 100 0 (B1) Unknown 100 100 0 (B2) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 70 (C2) HDA temperature 100 100 36 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 6276 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 110 (E8) Unknown 100 100 100 (F1) Unknown 100 100 59036 (F2) Unknown 100 100 52095 (F5) Unknown 100 100 101216	53.3% Above average	Read 261 Write 249 Mixed 259 57% 256 MB/s	4K Read 20.2 4K Write 43.7 4K Mixed 17.4 76% 27.1 MB/s	DQ Read 92.7 DQ Write 123 DQ Mixed 17.2 38% 77.6 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 53.3% Great: 90%
Asmt 2115 250GB 466 User benchmarks, average bench 21% 202GB free Firmware: 0 Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	19.6% Very poor	Read 34.4 Write 29.4 Mixed 31.7 24% 31.8 MB/s	4K Read 6.55 4K Write 7.28 4K Mixed 7.11 1,198% 6.98 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 19.6% Great: 39%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x2GB 446,702 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 2 of 4 slots used 4GB DIMM DDR2 Performing below potential (22^nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	13.4% Very poor	MC Read 4.8 MC Write 3.8 MC Mixed 4.1 12% 4.23 GB/s	SC Read 2 SC Write 1.7 SC Mixed 2.8 6% 2.17 GB/s	Latency 105 38% 105 ns
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 13.4% Great: 44%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Hp-pavilion GQ621AA-UUB v7248hk

Performance Results

PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Feedback

PC Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)