Asrock 990FX Extreme4

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 20% Surfboard	Desktop 61% Destroyer	Workstation 14% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	37% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (24%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago.

Motherboard	Asrock 990FX Extreme4 (all builds)
Memory	4.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20110817
Uptime	0.4 Days
Run Date	Feb 12 '18 at 02:11
Run Duration	168 Seconds
Run User	FRA-User
Background CPU	24%

PC Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Phenom II X4 980 1,088 User benchmarks, average bench 58% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)	56.4% Above average	Memory 78.5 1-Core 55.4 2-Core 111 51% 81.6 Pts	4-Core 203 8-Core 191 27% 197 Pts	64-Core 202 12% 202 Pts
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 56.4% Great: 64%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD R9 280X-$500 94,130 User benchmarks, average bench 35% Sapphire(174B 3001) CLim: 1000 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 18.2.1 Performing way above expectations (85^th percentile)	37% Below average	Lighting 48.4 Reflection 32.1 Parallax 60.7 39% 47.1 fps	MRender 30.6 Gravity 47.1 Splatting 39.7 32% 39.1 fps
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 37% Great: 39%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
WD Blue 2TB (2015)-$84 253,816 User benchmarks, average bench 65% 1.5TB free Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 170 166 4466 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 903 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 97 97 2221 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 341 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 86 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 191 191 27307 (C2) HDA temperature 114 98 33 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 2 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	78.6% Very good	Read 132 Write 142 Mixed 97.6 92% 124 MB/s	4K Read 0.78 4K Write 2.47 4K Mixed 0.26 108% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 78.6% Great: 84%
Hitachi HDT725050VLA380 500GB 1,490 User benchmarks, average bench 33% 433GB free (System drive) Firmware: V56OA73A Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing above expectations (71^st percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 106 106 42979426785 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 5390 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 97 97 24287 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 4598 (C0) Power-off retract count 95 95 6000 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 95 95 6000 (C2) HDA temperature 176 176 253403529250 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 253 0	37% Below average	Read 70.3 Write 58.3 Mixed 42.3 42% 57 MB/s	4K Read 0.52 4K Write 1.38 4K Mixed 0.25 75% 0.72 MB/s
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 37% Great: 40%
Seagate ST3160812AS 160GB-$47 10,399 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 38GB free Firmware: 3.AHL Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing below expectations (36^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 253 0 (03) Spinup time 94 93 0 (04) Start/Stop count 97 97 3117 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 80 60 39544689094 (09) Power-on hours count 88 88 10560 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 2980 (BB) vendor-specific 1 1 21365 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 65 45 638582819 (C2) HDA temperature 35 55 38654705699 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 68 44 137802401 (C5) Current pending sector count 1 1 4294967293 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 1 1 4294967293 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 100 253 0	27.2% Poor	Read 54.5 Write 40.1 Mixed 30.9 31% 41.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.33 4K Write 1.05 4K Mixed 0.26 62% 0.55 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 27.2% Great: 40%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL RipjawsX DDR3 1333 C7 2x4GB 894 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 2 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	26% Poor	MC Read 9.8 MC Write 7.3 MC Mixed 8.8 25% 8.63 GB/s	SC Read 5.3 SC Write 6.7 SC Mixed 6.4 18% 6.13 GB/s	Latency 83.3 48% 83.3 ns
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 26% Great: 56%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical 990FX Extreme4 Builds (Compare 71 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 63%

Destroyer

Desktop 68%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 50%

Yacht

Motherboard: Asrock 990FX Extreme4 - $229

CPU
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples	37x
FX-8120AMDBench 56%, 25,690 samples	5x
FX-8150AMD $770Bench 59%, 22,181 samples	4x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	3x
GTX 650Nvidia $112Bench 8%, 69,673 samples	3x
GTX 660Nvidia $170Bench 20%, 123,956 samples	3x

SSD
MX500 500GBCrucial $54Bench 106%, 237,241 samples	6x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	3x
T25 31TBTeamBench 58%, 15 samples	3x

RAM
RipjawsX DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBG.SKILLBench 49%, 28,220 samples	4x
99U5403-159.A01LF 99U5471-054.A00LF 16GBKingstonBench 52%, 29 samples	4x
HyperX DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBKingstonBench 50%, 19,207 samples	3x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 62% - Good

Total price: $813

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16