HP Compaq 8000 Elite CMT PC

Performance Results


Gaming 8% Tree trunk	Desktop 50% Yacht	Workstation 6% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 50.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	9.87% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	28.4% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 8GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	HP Compaq 8000 Elite CMT PC (all builds)
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 3647h
Memory	5.8 GB free of 8.00391 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit barev
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20091022
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Feb 10 '18 at 09:41
Run Duration	136 Seconds
Run User	CZE-User
Background CPU	2%

PC Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 Quad Q9400-$170 24,176 User benchmarks, average bench 46% XU1 PROCESSOR, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.65 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	50.6% Above average	Memory 75.6 1-Core 38.1 2-Core 76.6 42% 63.4 Pts	4-Core 150 8-Core 153 20% 152 Pts	64-Core 152 9% 152 Pts
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 50.6% Great: 53%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD R7 250 25,802 User benchmarks, average bench 8% Sapphire(174B E266) 1GB CLim: 1050 MHz, MLim: 1150 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 18.1.1 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	9.87% Terrible	Lighting 11.8 Reflection 13 Parallax 14.4 10% 13.1 fps	MRender 13.2 Gravity 10.2 Splatting 14.2 10% 12.5 fps
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 9.87% Great: 9%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WD Green 240GB (2016) 20,831 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 75GB free (System drive) Firmware: Z3311000 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below potential (2^nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 0 100 405 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 83 (A5) Unknown 100 100 21484470385 (A6) Unknown 100 100 1 (A7) Unknown 100 100 0 (A8) Unknown 100 100 6 (A9) Unknown 100 100 0 (AA) Unknown 100 100 0 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 100 100 1 (AE) Unknown 100 100 12 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 62 56 188978561062 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 1 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 158915493925 (E8) Unknown 100 100 100 (E9) Unknown 100 100 435 (EA) Unknown 100 100 1062 (F1) Unknown 253 253 799 (F2) Unknown 253 253 556 (F4) Unknown 0 100 0	28.4% Poor	Read 191 Write 105 Mixed 98.3 29% 131 MB/s	4K Read 18.6 4K Write 17.3 4K Mixed 3.14 41% 13 MB/s	DQ Read 95.5 DQ Write 36.3 DQ Mixed 4.25 19% 45.3 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 28.4% Great: 70%
Hitachi HDS721025CLA382 250GB-$20 5,436 User benchmarks, average bench 52% 222GB free Firmware: JP1OA3BF Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 85 0 (02) Throughput performance 135 100 97 (03) Spinup time 118 100 12897616067 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 998 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 134 100 33 (09) Power-on hours count 94 94 46386 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 548 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (B9) Unknown 100 100 65535 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 95 8593604859 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 70 58 438173726 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 1015 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 1015 (C2) HDA temperature 200 142 180389675038 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	73.2% Very good	Read 126 Write 129 Mixed 123 95% 126 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.24 4K Mixed 0.44 97% 0.76 MB/s
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 73.2% Great: 75%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown ID:00 00 ID:00 00 ID:00 00 ID:00 00 44GB 24 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 0 MHz 2048, 2048, 2048, 2048, 36864 MB Performing below potential (40^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	22.2% Poor	MC Read 7.5 MC Write 6.6 MC Mixed 6.6 20% 6.9 GB/s	SC Read 6.4 SC Write 6.6 SC Mixed 7.5 20% 6.83 GB/s	Latency 89 45% 89 ns
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 22.2% Great: 35%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Compaq 8000 Elite CMT PC Builds (Compare 319 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 4%

Tree trunk

Desktop 40%

Speed boat

Workstation 4%

Tree trunk

System: HP Compaq 8000 Elite CMT PC

CPU
Core2 Duo E8400Intel $89Bench 40%, 68,540 samples	98x
Core2 Duo E8500Intel $110Bench 42%, 18,841 samples	50x
Core2 Quad Q8400Intel $150Bench 45%, 18,432 samples	29x

GPU
Q45/Q43 Express ChipsetIntelBench 0%, 16,152 samples	70x
GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples	30x
GT 1030NvidiaBench 14%, 185,384 samples	21x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	6x
RTOTJ128VGD2EYX 128GBBench 54%, 1,124 samples	5x
870 EVO 500GBSamsung $58Bench 104%, 60,851 samples	5x

RAM
ID:80 CE M378B5673FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M378B5673FH0-CH9 40GBUnknownBench 25%, 680 samples	7x
ID:80 CE M378B5673EH1-CH9 ID:80 CE M378B5673EH1-CH9 40GBUnknownBench 22%, 367 samples	7x
ID:80 AD HMT125U6TFR8C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT125U6TFR8C-H9 40GBUnknownBench 25%, 540 samples	5x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 47% - Average

Total price: $117

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16