Asrock M3A785GMH/128M

Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 41% Speed boat	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 41.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	1.79% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	36.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago.

Motherboard	Asrock M3A785GMH/128M (all builds)
Memory	4.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20090804
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Feb 10 '18 at 09:18
Run Duration	264 Seconds
Run User	JPN-User
Background CPU	100%

PC Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Phenom II X2 550 3,836 User benchmarks, average bench 46% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	41.4% Average	Memory 73.8 1-Core 35.8 2-Core 68.7 40% 59.4 Pts	4-Core 53.2 8-Core 67.4 8% 60.3 Pts	64-Core 37.1 2% 37.1 Pts
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 41.4% Great: 51%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6450 32,407 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Sapphire(174B E204) 1GB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008 Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)	1.79% Terrible	Lighting 2.37 Reflection 2.38 Parallax 2.03 2% 2.26 fps	MRender 1.9 Gravity 1.63 Splatting 2 2% 1.85 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 1.79% Great: 2%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 130GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 4797 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 1466 (B1) Unknown 97 97 45 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 64 40 36 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 41 (F1) Unknown 99 99 21660057866	36.3% Below average	Read 194 Write 169 Mixed 162 39% 175 MB/s	4K Read 15.8 4K Write 24.1 4K Mixed 14 55% 18 MB/s	DQ Read 28.3 DQ Write 40.8 DQ Mixed 15.6 17% 28.2 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 36.3% Great: 124%
WD Green 1TB (2009)-$65 103,919 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 545GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing as expected (55^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 118 (03) Spinup time 163 158 6841 (04) Start/Stop count 90 90 10632 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 73 73 20029 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 90 90 10544 (C0) Power-off retract count 193 193 5670 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 197 197 10632 (C2) HDA temperature 119 92 31 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 162 0	42.7% Average	Read 75.4 Write 73.1 Mixed 51.9 50% 66.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.66 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 0.35 107% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 42.7% Great: 57%
Hitachi Deskstar P7K500 500GB-$159 43,620 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 124GB free Firmware: GM4OA5CA Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing below expectations (24^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 99 99 131072 (02) Throughput performance 132 132 141 (03) Spinup time 118 118 25791234373 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 6665 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 131 131 29 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 18767 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 3882 (C0) Power-off retract count 95 95 6916 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 95 95 6916 (C2) HDA temperature 171 171 266288627747 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	35.5% Below average	Read 58.7 Write 64.7 Mixed 40.7 41% 54.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.33 4K Write 1.42 4K Mixed 0.31 74% 0.68 MB/s
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 35.5% Great: 51%
Generic Flash Disk 2GB 353 User benchmarks, average bench 5% 0GB free, PID 7788 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	7.05% Terrible	Read 23.5 Write 10.2 Mixed 14 18% 15.9 MB/s	4K Read 4.44 4K Write 0.12 4K Mixed 0.11 24% 1.56 MB/s
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 7.05% Great: 16%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 8GB 82,857 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 667, 667 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	22.3% Poor	MC Read 8.8 MC Write 6.1 MC Mixed 8.4 22% 7.77 GB/s	SC Read 2.9 SC Write 2.9 SC Mixed 4.3 10% 3.37 GB/s	Latency 92.9 43% 92.9 ns
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 22.3% Great: 51%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical M3A785GMH/128M Builds (Compare 18 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 41%

Speed boat

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock M3A785GMH/128M

CPU
Athlon II X3 435AMD $160Bench 43%, 1,878 samples	3x
Phenom II X4 955AMD $83Bench 51%, 41,403 samples	2x
Athlon II X2 250 (2013 D.Ri)AMDBench 40%, 19,471 samples	2x

GPU
Radeon HD 4200ATIBench 1%, 10,090 samples	5x
HD 7870AMD $203Bench 26%, 42,130 samples	3x
GTX 460Nvidia $203Bench 12%, 31,648 samples	1x

SSD
BX500 480GBCrucial $38Bench 63%, 83,298 samples	3x
M4 128GBCrucial $116Bench 60%, 34,516 samples	2x
INTENSO 128GBBench 65%, 3,345 samples	1x

RAM
4GBUnknownBench 26%, 42,830 samples	5x
8GBUnknownBench 34%, 82,857 samples	5x
16GBUnknownBench 41%, 70,565 samples	5x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 46% - Average

Total price: $198

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $274	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $42	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16