Asrock Z77 Professional-M

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 51%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 43%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics60.2% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive84.6% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
High background CPU (25%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock Z77 Professional-M  (all builds)
Memory18.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20130712
Uptime2 Days
Run DateFeb 02 '16 at 23:04
Run Duration342 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 25%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2600K-$319
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
80.9% Excellent
Memory 93.5
1-Core 111
2-Core 205
80% 137 Pts
4-Core 369
8-Core 558
58% 464 Pts
64-Core 560
35% 560 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 80.9%
Great: 83%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 3000 (Desktop V2 1.35 GHz)-$15
ASRock(1849 0122) 2GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4229
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
2.35% Terrible
Lighting 2.57
Reflection 3.92
Parallax 1.72
2% 2.74 fps
MRender 3.81
Gravity 1.4
Splatting 4.78
3% 3.33 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.35%
Great: 2%
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
Asus(1043 8531) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 10.18.13.6175
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
60.2% Good
Lighting 77.1
Reflection 77.3
Parallax 67.2
63% 73.9 fps
MRender 67.2
Gravity 69.7
Splatting 65.3
55% 67.4 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 60.2%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial BX100 250GB-$141
206GB free
Firmware: MU02 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
77.7% Very good
Read 381
Write 367
Mixed 395
85% 381 MB/s
4K Read 23.1
4K Write 46.5
4K Mixed 28.2
96% 32.6 MB/s
DQ Read 275
DQ Write 188
DQ Mixed 109
115% 191 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 77.7%
Great: 103%
Transcend SSD370S 256GB-$115
206GB free
Firmware: N1114H Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
78.5% Very good
Read 379
Write 369
Mixed 399
86% 383 MB/s
4K Read 23.3
4K Write 46.5
4K Mixed 28.4
96% 32.7 MB/s
DQ Read 285
DQ Write 202
DQ Mixed 120
123% 202 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 78.5%
Great: 114%
Intel Raid 0 Volume 240GB
83GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0.
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
84.6% Excellent
Read 888
Write 238
Mixed 297
103% 475 MB/s
4K Read 23.7
4K Write 39.3
4K Mixed 17.1
79% 26.7 MB/s
DQ Read 210
DQ Write 286
DQ Mixed 61.9
99% 186 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 84.6%
Great: 133%
Intel Raid 5 Volume 6TB
2TB free
Firmware: 1.0.
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
13% Very poor
Read 22.8
Write 21.7
Mixed 23.1
17% 22.5 MB/s
4K Read 1.44
4K Write 1.74
4K Mixed 0.47
145% 1.22 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 13%
Great: 159%
Kingston DataTraveler 2.0 8GB
7GB free, PID 6545
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
6.99% Terrible
Read 22
Write 9.13
Mixed 9.07
15% 13.4 MB/s
4K Read 7.56
4K Write 0.006
4K Mixed 0.005
28% 2.52 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 6.99%
Great: 6%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX1866C10D3/8G KHX1866C10D3/8G 01BA 8GBH2X04HAAA30-15 01BA 8GBH2X04HAAA30-15 32GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
56.6% Above average
MC Read 19.3
MC Write 20.2
MC Mixed 18
55% 19.2 GB/s
SC Read 15.8
SC Write 19.3
SC Mixed 18.4
51% 17.8 GB/s
Latency 61
66% 61 ns
Poor: 56%
This bench: 56.6%
Great: 64%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z77 Professional-M Builds (Compare 82 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asrock Z77 Professional-M

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 65% - Good Total price: $404
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $15Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback