Asrock Z270 Gaming K6

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 48%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 39%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics49.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive218% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago.
MotherboardAsrock Z270 Gaming K6  (all builds)
Memory11 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20161103
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 08 '18 at 20:23
Run Duration214 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 19%

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6600K-$81
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
85.8% Excellent
Memory 90.1
1-Core 127
2-Core 251
87% 156 Pts
4-Core 470
8-Core 478
63% 474 Pts
64-Core 478
30% 478 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 85.8%
Great: 85%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
CLim: 1455 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 390.65
Performing below potential (66th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
49.9% Average
Lighting 61.9
Reflection 65.1
Parallax 58.3
50% 61.8 fps
MRender 68.8
Gravity 57.8
Splatting 54.6
49% 60.4 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 49.9%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43
291GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
218% Outstanding
Read 1,883
Write 1,171
Mixed 1,205
314% 1,420 MB/s
4K Read 42.3
4K Write 106
4K Mixed 50.8
185% 66.4 MB/s
DQ Read 426
DQ Write 233
DQ Mixed 144
156% 268 MB/s
Poor: 153%
This bench: 218%
Great: 254%
OCZ AMD Radeon R7 240GB-$110
15GB free
Firmware: 1.01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
78.5% Very good
Read 364
Write 373
Mixed 367
82% 368 MB/s
4K Read 22.7
4K Write 92.9
4K Mixed 17.5
106% 44.4 MB/s
DQ Read 249
DQ Write 213
DQ Mixed 56.2
90% 173 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 78.5%
Great: 108%
Crucial M4 128GB-$116
3GB free
Firmware: 040H Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
54.7% Above average
Read 373
Write 187
Mixed 256
60% 272 MB/s
4K Read 22.3
4K Write 81.1
4K Mixed 5.54
84% 36.3 MB/s
DQ Read 126
DQ Write 108
DQ Mixed 7.61
36% 80.8 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 54.7%
Great: 72%
WD Black 2TB (2013)-$48
2TB free
Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
87.7% Excellent
Read 151
Write 155
Mixed 148
114% 151 MB/s
4K Read 0.97
4K Write 2.49
4K Mixed 0.27
117% 1.24 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 87.7%
Great: 112%
Hitachi UltraStar 7K4000 2TB
826GB free
Firmware: MJ6OA580 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
68.6% Good
Read 118
Write 121
Mixed 119
90% 119 MB/s
4K Read 0.91
4K Write 1.93
4K Mixed 0.22
98% 1.02 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 68.6%
Great: 91%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70
42GB free
Firmware: CC34 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
38.7% Below average
Read 72.7
Write 62
Mixed 74.6
53% 69.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.47
4K Write 1.14
4K Mixed 0.39
84% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 38.7%
Great: 68%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 2666 C15 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
73% Very good
MC Read 26.6
MC Write 27.4
MC Mixed 22.8
73% 25.6 GB/s
SC Read 17.2
SC Write 27.1
SC Mixed 24.1
65% 22.8 GB/s
Latency 67.1
60% 67.1 ns
Poor: 43%
This bench: 73%
Great: 96%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z270 Gaming K6 Builds (Compare 664 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 70%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 60%
Gunboat

Motherboard: Asrock Z270 Gaming K6

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 92% - Outstanding Total price: $531
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $275Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback