Asus P7P55D-E LX

Performance Results


Gaming 3% Tree trunk	Desktop 63% Destroyer	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	3.47% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	41.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus P7P55D-E LX (all builds)
Memory	0.7 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20101216
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Feb 08 '18 at 01:58
Run Duration	170 Seconds
Run User	CHL-User
Background CPU	13%

PC Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-750-$72 43,796 User benchmarks, average bench 62% LGA1156, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.65 GHz Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	70.3% Very good	Memory 93.3 1-Core 75.4 2-Core 146 65% 105 Pts	4-Core 278 8-Core 269 37% 273 Pts	64-Core 282 17% 282 Pts
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 70.3% Great: 71%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTS 250 14,881 User benchmarks, average bench 7% XFX(1682 2605) 1GB Ram: 1GB, Driver: 342.1 Relative performance (0^th percentile)	3.47% Terrible	Lighting 2.47 Reflection 4.54 Parallax 3.66 2% 3.55 fps	MRender 8.29 Gravity 7.43 Splatting 7.52 6% 7.75 fps
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 3.47% Great: 8%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
HyperX Fury 240GB-$193 27,826 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 126GB free (System drive) Firmware: 608ABBF0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 95 95 34131566 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 55602646615651 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 688 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 106 (B1) Unknown 0 0 1 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 33 37 42952097825 (C2) HDA temperature 33 37 42952097825 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 120 120 34131566 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 120 120 34131566 (CC) Soft ECC correction 120 120 34131566 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 100 (E7) Temperature 100 100 107374182400 (E9) Unknown 0 0 2487 (EA) Unknown 0 0 1653 (F1) Unknown 0 0 1653 (F2) Unknown 0 0 1413 (F4) Unknown 100 100 2162696	41.3% Average	Read 194 Write 198 Mixed 178 42% 190 MB/s	4K Read 13.7 4K Write 46.4 4K Mixed 13.8 63% 24.6 MB/s	DQ Read 31.7 DQ Write 84.2 DQ Mixed 14.9 24% 43.6 MB/s
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 41.3% Great: 84%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$24 496,077 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 805GB free Firmware: 15.01H15 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 141 137 3908 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 1161 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 1488 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 727 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 133 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 200 200 1027 (C2) HDA temperature 114 88 29 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 1	119% Outstanding	Read 214 Write 201 Mixed 134 136% 183 MB/s	4K Read 0.72 4K Write 3.69 4K Mixed 0.75 181% 1.72 MB/s
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 119% Great: 69%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$24 496,077 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 805GB free Firmware: 15.01H15 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 141 139 3908 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 1143 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 1342 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 700 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 106 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 200 200 1036 (C2) HDA temperature 113 105 30 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	122% Outstanding	Read 213 Write 211 Mixed 181 151% 202 MB/s	4K Read 0.79 4K Write 3.44 4K Mixed 0.69 174% 1.64 MB/s
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 122% Great: 69%
WD Blue 500GB (2008)-$29 203,744 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 148GB free Firmware: 12.01C02 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing as expected (52^nd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 209 199 2516 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 286 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 1593 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 263 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 236 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 200 200 286 (C2) HDA temperature 109 94 38 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 1 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	47.1% Average	Read 92.8 Write 71.2 Mixed 33.2 48% 65.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.47 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.3 92% 0.96 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 47.1% Great: 69%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 4GB 42,830 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 1333, 1333 MHz 2048, 2048 MB Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)	27.5% Poor	MC Read 8.9 MC Write 8 MC Mixed 7.9 24% 8.27 GB/s	SC Read 8.4 SC Write 9 SC Mixed 8 24% 8.47 GB/s	Latency 61.5 65% 61.5 ns
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 27.5% Great: 46%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P7P55D-E LX Builds (Compare 490 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 22%

Surfboard

Desktop 71%

Battleship

Workstation 17%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus P7P55D-E LX

CPU
Core i5 760Intel $100Bench 64%, 34,495 samples	125x
Core i7 870Intel $100Bench 66%, 37,228 samples	116x
Core i7 860Intel $339Bench 64%, 51,451 samples	89x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	28x
GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples	26x
GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples	22x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	29x
256GB 256GBNetacBench 67%, 2,108 samples	14x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	12x

RAM
16GBUnknownBench 41%, 70,565 samples	186x
8GBUnknownBench 34%, 82,857 samples	137x
12GBUnknownBench 35%, 85,415 samples	69x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 85% - Excellent

Total price: $187

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16