Asrock Z370M Pro4

Performance Results


Gaming 61% Destroyer	Desktop 97% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 53% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	59.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	263% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago.

Motherboard	Asrock Z370M Pro4 (all builds)
Memory	13.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180118
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Feb 07 '18 at 22:21
Run Duration	159 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	13%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9400F How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-8400-$131 312,220 User benchmarks, average bench 82% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	92.7% Outstanding	Memory 93.6 1-Core 126 2-Core 250 88% 157 Pts	4-Core 494 8-Core 747 77% 620 Pts	64-Core 742 46% 742 Pts
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 92.7% Great: 89%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117 1,368,019 User benchmarks, average bench 56% EVGA(3842 6163) CLim: 2012 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 390.77 Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	59.9% Above average	Lighting 73.3 Reflection 80.4 Parallax 67.9 60% 73.9 fps	MRender 72.6 Gravity 69.4 Splatting 76.9 60% 73 fps
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 59.9% Great: 60%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston HyperX 3K 240GB-$70 27,495 User benchmarks, average bench 81% 223GB free Firmware: 502ABBF0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (68^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 118 118 171288727 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 0 0 -108198816112377 (0C) Power cycle count 97 97 3953 (AB) Unknown 0 0 0 (AC) Unknown 0 0 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 74 (B1) Unknown 0 0 2 (B5) Unknown 0 0 0 (B6) Unknown 0 0 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 25 81 51544915993 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 120 120 171288727 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 120 120 171288727 (CC) Soft ECC correction 120 120 171288727 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 100 (E7) Temperature 100 100 0 (E9) Unknown 0 0 13349 (EA) Unknown 0 0 16960 (F1) Unknown 0 0 16960 (F2) Unknown 0 0 26255	85.8% Excellent	Read 503 Write 258 Mixed 313 79% 358 MB/s	4K Read 29 4K Write 108 4K Mixed 22.6 130% 53.1 MB/s	DQ Read 280 DQ Write 252 DQ Mixed 67.8 105% 200 MB/s
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 85.8% Great: 94%
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45 240,629 User benchmarks, average bench 199% 68GB free (System drive) Firmware: 3B7Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	263% Outstanding	Read 2,826 Write 1,265 Mixed 1,443 404% 1,845 MB/s	4K Read 35.9 4K Write 133 4K Mixed 42.6 179% 70.4 MB/s	DQ Read 495 DQ Write 346 DQ Mixed 181 200% 340 MB/s
Poor: 142% ↑ This bench: 263% Great: 236%
Seagate FireCuda SSHD 2TB (2016)-$79 133,734 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 1.5TB free Firmware: CC41 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (53^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 115 99 85798552 (03) Spinup time 96 95 0 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 126 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 64 60 2865588 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 153 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 136 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 71 67 488243229 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 18 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 854 (C2) HDA temperature 29 40 60129542173 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 84524956385422 (F1) Unknown 100 253 1573885624 (F2) Unknown 100 253 44554374659	86.5% Excellent	Read 122 Write 179 Mixed 139 110% 146 MB/s	4K Read 0.75 4K Write 5.34 4K Mixed 0.82 221% 2.3 MB/s
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 86.5% Great: 110%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$32 1,562,409 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 433GB free Firmware: CC44 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (48^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 116 99 106781328 (03) Spinup time 97 97 0 (04) Start/Stop count 94 94 6186 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 78 60 60872371 (09) Power-on hours count 91 91 7959 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 97 97 3948 (B7) Unknown 99 99 1 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 72 63 13356367900 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 76 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 61 61 78728 (C2) HDA temperature 28 40 -140737488355300 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 117750823391266 (F1) Unknown 100 253 6227376163 (F2) Unknown 100 253 33452717629	90.6% Outstanding	Read 177 Write 139 Mixed 124 110% 147 MB/s	4K Read 0.86 4K Write 1.24 4K Mixed 0.25 87% 0.79 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 90.6% Great: 112%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB 5,058 User benchmarks, average bench 87% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below potential (28^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	76% Very good	MC Read 28.9 MC Write 29.2 MC Mixed 21.7 76% 26.6 GB/s	SC Read 17.7 SC Write 29.2 SC Mixed 23.1 67% 23.3 GB/s	Latency 60.7 66% 60.7 ns
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 76% Great: 104%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Z370M Pro4 Builds (Compare 1,413 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 55%

Yacht

Desktop 91%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 50%

Yacht

Motherboard: Asrock Z370M Pro4

CPU
Core i7-8700KIntel $186Bench 88%, 746,287 samples	269x
Core i5-8400Intel $131Bench 82%, 312,220 samples	222x
Core i7-8700Intel $200Bench 87%, 349,567 samples	186x

GPU
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	92x
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	84x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	81x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	38x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	30x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	24x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	34x
Aegis DDR4 3000 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $38Bench 82%, 163,634 samples	34x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $36Bench 84%, 287,720 samples	32x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 89% - Excellent

Total price: $445

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16