Hp-pavilion GU679AA-UUW m9067.sc-a

Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 40% Speed boat	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 45%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	1.62% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	35.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	Hp-pavilion GU679AA-UUW m9067.sc-a (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK Berkeley
Memory	2.1 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit farver
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20070816
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Feb 07 '18 at 13:46
Run Duration	170 Seconds
Run User	DNK-User
Background CPU	2%

PC Performing as expected (50^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 Quad Q6600-$100 59,658 User benchmarks, average bench 42% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)	45% Average	Memory 71.5 1-Core 27.6 2-Core 55.4 36% 51.5 Pts	4-Core 111 8-Core 110 15% 110 Pts	64-Core 108 7% 108 Pts
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 45% Great: 50%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 8600 GT 8,099 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Asus(1043 034E) 512MB Ram: 512MB, Driver: 342.1 Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	1.62% Terrible	Lighting 1.73 Reflection 3.27 Parallax 0.59 1% 1.87 fps	MRender 3.05 Gravity 1.23 Splatting 3 2% 2.43 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.62% Great: 2%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 750 EVO 250GB-$55 75,831 User benchmarks, average bench 94% 27GB free (System drive) Firmware: MAT01B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 825 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 929 (B1) Unknown 97 97 14 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 63 48 37 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 16 (F1) Unknown 99 99 5069801714	35.1% Below average	Read 221 Write 127 Mixed 127 35% 158 MB/s	4K Read 25 4K Write 22.6 4K Mixed 8.7 61% 18.8 MB/s	DQ Read 24.7 DQ Write 21.9 DQ Mixed 8.93 11% 18.5 MB/s
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 35.1% Great: 114%
WD Blue 320GB (2007)-$80 108,153 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 118GB free Firmware: 12.01B02 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 159 155 5050 (04) Start/Stop count 94 94 6021 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 94 94 5030 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 95 95 5648 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 99 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 198 198 6064 (C2) HDA temperature 112 104 35 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	32.1% Below average	Read 38.3 Write 73.1 Mixed 36.8 37% 49.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.23 4K Write 1.93 4K Mixed 0.26 74% 0.81 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 32.1% Great: 58%
ST332082 0AS 320GB 126 User benchmarks, average bench 15% 116GB free, PID 070c Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	15.6% Very poor	Read 30.2 Write 27.7 Mixed 28.9 37% 28.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.39 4K Write 1.65 4K Mixed 0.31 68% 0.78 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 15.6% Great: 18%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 4x1GB 54,972 User benchmarks, average bench 18% 4 of 4 slots used 4GB DIMM SDRAM Performing as expected (58^th percentile)	16.9% Very poor	MC Read 6 MC Write 4.5 MC Mixed 4.8 15% 5.1 GB/s	SC Read 4.8 SC Write 5 SC Mixed 5 14% 4.93 GB/s	Latency 98 41% 98 ns
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 16.9% Great: 28%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GU679AA-UUW m9067.sc-a Builds (Compare 5 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 3%

Tree trunk

Desktop 39%

Jet ski

Workstation 3%

Tree trunk

System: Hp-pavilion GU679AA-UUW m9067.sc-a

CPU
Core2 Quad Q6600Intel $100Bench 42%, 59,658 samples	5x

GPU
Radeon HD 4300ATIBench 1%, 14,988 samples	3x
GeForce 8600 GTNvidiaBench 2%, 8,099 samples	2x

SSD
X300s Non-Secure 256GBSanDiskBench 82%, 2,451 samples	2x

RAM
7GBUnknownBench 24%, 8,824 samples	3x
3GBUnknownBench 14%, 81,553 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 55% - Above average

Total price: $100

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $132	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16