Asrock D1800B-ITX

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (75th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 25 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 35.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsrock D1800B-ITX  (all builds)
Memory2.5 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit barev
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160331
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateFeb 07 '18 at 08:18
Run Duration137 Seconds
Run User CZE-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (75th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron J1800
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
35.7% Below average
Memory 63.7
1-Core 24.4
2-Core 48.5
32% 45.5 Pts
4-Core 48
8-Core 48.6
6% 48.3 Pts
64-Core 48.1
3% 48.1 Pts
Poor: 15%
This bench: 35.7%
Great: 37%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 2.5" 500GB-$21
46GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
55.8% Above average
Read 95.8
Write 98.3
Mixed 100
74% 98.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.41
4K Write 1.99
4K Mixed 0.17
72% 0.86 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 55.8%
Great: 61%
General USB Flash Disk 16GB
10GB free, PID 1000
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
26% Poor
Read 128
Write 11.6
Mixed 18.2
44% 52.6 MB/s
4K Read 7.05
4K Write 1.06
4K Mixed 0.86
91% 2.99 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 26%
Great: 15%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT51264BF160BJ.C8F 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (26th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
16.9% Very poor
MC Read 5.4
MC Write 4.9
MC Mixed 6.1
16% 5.47 GB/s
SC Read 2.7
SC Write 5.2
SC Mixed 4.8
12% 4.23 GB/s
Latency 117
34% 117 ns
Poor: 11%
This bench: 16.9%
Great: 32%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical D1800B-ITX Builds (Compare 31 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 30%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock D1800B-ITX

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 12% - Very poor Total price: $29
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback