Asrock FM2A85X Extreme4-M

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 47.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics20.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive29.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (49%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago.
MotherboardAsrock FM2A85X Extreme4-M  (all builds)
Memory10 GB free of 16 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben,
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20130711
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateFeb 07 '18 at 05:26
Run Duration231 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 49%

 PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A8-6600K APU-$88
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.9 GHz
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
47.1% Average
Memory 72
1-Core 60.4
2-Core 90.5
48% 74.3 Pts
4-Core 130
8-Core 142
18% 136 Pts
64-Core 153
10% 153 Pts
Poor: 36%
This bench: 47.1%
Great: 60%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R7 260X-$120
Sapphire(174B E253) 2GB
CLim: 1150 MHz, MLim: 1650 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 18.2.1
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
20.4% Poor
Lighting 24.8
Reflection 27.3
Parallax 28.5
20% 26.8 fps
MRender 24.8
Gravity 22.1
Splatting 28.5
21% 25.1 fps
Poor: 18%
This bench: 20.4%
Great: 22%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
201GB free
Firmware: EMT01B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
47.4% Average
Read 271
Write 269
Mixed 234
58% 258 MB/s
4K Read 21.5
4K Write 29
4K Mixed 11.4
62% 20.6 MB/s
DQ Read 31.3
DQ Write 49.7
DQ Mixed 18.3
20% 33.1 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 47.4%
Great: 124%
SanDisk SSD Plus 480GB-$40
184GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Z32080RL Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
29.9% Poor
Read 239
Write 188
Mixed 11.6
32% 146 MB/s
4K Read 11.6
4K Write 12.9
4K Mixed 3.17
28% 9.22 MB/s
DQ Read 24.3
DQ Write 13.1
DQ Mixed 5.83
8% 14.4 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 29.9%
Great: 76%
Samsung HN-M101MBB 1TB-$45
259GB free
Firmware: 2AR1 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
44.6% Average
Read 75.7
Write 79.7
Mixed 69.5
56% 75 MB/s
4K Read 0.46
4K Write 1.51
4K Mixed 0.33
83% 0.76 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 44.6%
Great: 59%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$50
202GB free
Firmware: CC24 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
88.6% Excellent
Read 179
Write 129
Mixed 125
108% 145 MB/s
4K Read 0.63
4K Write 3.75
4K Mixed 0.26
125% 1.55 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 88.6%
Great: 114%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$40
13GB free
Firmware: CC27 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
82.2% Excellent
Read 142
Write 145
Mixed 145
109% 144 MB/s
4K Read 0.38
4K Write 1.41
4K Mixed 0.25
70% 0.68 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 82.2%
Great: 113%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Nanya M2F4GH64CB8HB6N-CG M2F4GH64CB8HB6N-CG M2F4G64CB8HB5N-CG M2F4G64CB8HB5N-CG 16GB
667, 667, 667, 667 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
28.8% Poor
MC Read 12.9
MC Write 6
MC Mixed 10.6
28% 9.83 GB/s
SC Read 7.5
SC Write 6.3
SC Mixed 8.8
22% 7.53 GB/s
Latency 96.9
41% 96.9 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical FM2A85X Extreme4-M Builds (Compare 13 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock FM2A85X Extreme4-M

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 49% - Average Total price: $161
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback