Asus MAXIMUS VI FORMULA

Performance Results


Gaming 52% Yacht	Desktop 87% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 44% Speed boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	58% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	58.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.

Motherboard	Asus MAXIMUS VI FORMULA (all builds)
Memory	5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	2560x1440x4294967296 szín
OS	Windows 8.1
BIOS Date	20130819
Uptime	1.2 Days
Run Date	Feb 07 '18 at 00:38
Run Duration	177 Seconds
Run User	HUN-User
Background CPU	4%

PC Performing as expected (54^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-4770K-$120 172,887 User benchmarks, average bench 74% SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 0.8 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	84.2% Excellent	Memory 89.1 1-Core 123 2-Core 245 85% 152 Pts	4-Core 428 8-Core 649 67% 538 Pts	64-Core 658 41% 658 Pts
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 84.2% Great: 84%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX Vega-64-$400 91,676 User benchmarks, average bench 87% AMD(1002 6B76) CLim: 1630 MHz, MLim: 945 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 18.2.1 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	58% Above average	Lighting 66.4 Reflection 76.6 Parallax 62.2 54% 68.4 fps	MRender 84.7 Gravity 66.6 Splatting 86.8 66% 79.4 fps
Poor: 77% ↑ This bench: 58% Great: 94%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
OCZ Vertex 3 240GB-$80 4,893 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 74GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2.15 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 94 94 111982284 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 81 81 83923660980494 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1841 (AB) Unknown 0 0 0 (AC) Unknown 0 0 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 32 (B1) Unknown 0 0 7 (B5) Unknown 0 0 0 (B6) Unknown 0 0 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 30 30 128850984990 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 120 120 111982284 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 120 120 111982284 (CC) Soft ECC correction 120 120 111982284 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 100 (E7) Temperature 100 100 0 (E9) Unknown 0 0 22933 (EA) Unknown 0 0 20338 (F1) Unknown 0 0 20338 (F2) Unknown 0 0 46338	58.8% Above average	Read 481 Write 221 Mixed 286 72% 329 MB/s	4K Read 24.1 4K Write 56.8 4K Mixed 12 82% 31 MB/s	DQ Read 29.9 DQ Write 78.7 DQ Mixed 11.3 21% 39.9 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 58.8% Great: 91%
Goodram C40 240GB 479 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 33GB free Firmware: S8FM08.0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (53^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 3332 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 677 (A8) Unknown 100 100 2 (AA) Unknown 100 100 16 (AD) Unknown 100 100 1638477 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 9 (DA) Unknown 100 100 0 (E7) Temperature 100 100 99 (F1) Unknown 100 100 4066	63.3% Good	Read 476 Write 298 Mixed 365 84% 380 MB/s	4K Read 21.3 4K Write 60.5 4K Mixed 7.82 74% 29.9 MB/s	DQ Read 158 DQ Write 72 DQ Mixed 7.71 34% 79.2 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 63.3% Great: 80%
Samsung HD502HJ 500GB-$50 72,924 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 7GB free Firmware: 1AJ100E4 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 252 252 0 (03) Spinup time 83 1 5156 (04) Start/Stop count 97 97 3473 (05) Reallocated sector count 252 252 0 (07) Seek error rate 252 252 0 (08) Seek timer performance 252 252 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 28399 (0A) Spinup retry count 252 252 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 2 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 2330 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 12 (C0) Power-off retract count 252 252 0 (C2) HDA temperature 64 53 201864249380 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 0 (C4) Reallocation count 252 252 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 252 252 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 252 252 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 99 99 553 (C8) Write error rate 100 100 1 (DF) Load/unload retry count 100 100 2 (E1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 3507	45.5% Average	Read 81.5 Write 76.6 Mixed 74.6 58% 77.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.55 4K Write 1.96 4K Mixed 0.45 110% 0.99 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 45.5% Great: 77%
Samsung Spinpoint F3 1TB-$83 138,859 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 4GB free Firmware: 1AJ10001 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing as expected (52^nd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 252 252 0 (03) Spinup time 71 69 8833 (04) Start/Stop count 97 97 3341 (05) Reallocated sector count 252 252 0 (07) Seek error rate 252 252 0 (08) Seek timer performance 252 252 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 23406 (0A) Spinup retry count 252 252 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 1 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 2115 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 91 (C0) Power-off retract count 252 252 0 (C2) HDA temperature 62 46 231929020454 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 0 (C4) Reallocation count 252 252 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 252 252 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 252 252 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 100 1 (DF) Load/unload retry count 100 100 1 (E1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 3347	60% Good	Read 95.4 Write 114 Mixed 113 81% 108 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.98 4K Mixed 0.4 98% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 60% Great: 75%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Dominator DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GB 344 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 2 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	62.1% Good	MC Read 22.2 MC Write 22.6 MC Mixed 19.5 61% 21.4 GB/s	SC Read 16.4 SC Write 22 SC Mixed 21 57% 19.8 GB/s	Latency 68.3 58% 68.3 ns
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 62.1% Great: 62%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical MAXIMUS VI FORMULA Builds (Compare 834 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 61%

Destroyer

Desktop 80%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 51%

Yacht

Motherboard: Asus MAXIMUS VI FORMULA - $400

CPU
Core i7-4770KIntel $120Bench 74%, 172,887 samples	494x
Core i7-4790KIntel $348Bench 79%, 455,746 samples	159x
Core i5-4670KIntel $62Bench 68%, 128,482 samples	49x

GPU
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	65x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	54x
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	51x

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	35x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	35x
870 EVO 1TBSamsung $90Bench 112%, 129,044 samples	26x

RAM
Vengeance Pro DDR3 2400 C11 2x8GBCorsairBench 58%, 40,596 samples	32x
TridentX DDR3 2400 C10 2x8GBG.SKILLBench 67%, 24,592 samples	28x
Vengeance Pro DDR3 1866 C9 2x8GBCorsairBench 55%, 18,444 samples	26x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 90% - Excellent

Total price: $761

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16