HP EliteBook 8560w

Performance Results


Gaming 8% Tree trunk	Desktop 60% Gunboat	Workstation 7% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	3.54% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	109% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago.

System	HP EliteBook 8560w (all builds)
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 1631
Memory	28.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20161027
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Feb 06 '18 at 14:57
Run Duration	149 Seconds
Run User	FRA-User
Background CPU	15%

PC Performing above expectations (60^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-2670QM-$200 51,169 User benchmarks, average bench 56% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.2 GHz Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	64.3% Good	Memory 79.2 1-Core 72.4 2-Core 146 59% 99 Pts	4-Core 287 8-Core 290 38% 288 Pts	64-Core 286 18% 286 Pts
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 64.3% Great: 67%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro 1000M 6,108 User benchmarks, average bench 3% HP(103C 1631) 2GB Ram: 2GB, Driver: 307.83 Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	3.54% Terrible	Lighting 4.3 Reflection 5.04 Parallax 3.53 4% 4.29 fps	MRender 6.19 Gravity 4.53 Splatting 3.09 4% 4.6 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.54% Great: 3%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Ct1000mx 50 1TB 2,171 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 550GB free (System drive) Firmware: M3CR Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 24 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 12 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 100 100 1 (AE) Unknown 100 100 4 (B4) Unknown 0 0 38 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 55 49 219043332141 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 100 100 0 (CE) Flying height 100 100 0 (D2) Unknown 100 100 0 (F6) Unknown 100 100 885970758 (F7) Unknown 100 100 14297206 (F8) Unknown 100 100 9438445	109% Outstanding	Read 524 Write 483 Mixed 513 113% 506 MB/s	4K Read 34.3 4K Write 73.7 4K Mixed 40.8 143% 49.6 MB/s	DQ Read 332 DQ Write 299 DQ Mixed 102 135% 244 MB/s
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 109% Great: 115%
Seagate Expansion Desk 2TB 7,241 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 449GB free, PID 3320 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)	34.7% Below average	Read 89.2 Write 88.2 Mixed 19.4 77% 65.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.63 4K Write 0.78 4K Mixed 0.17 34% 0.52 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 34.7% Great: 74%
Seagate Expansion Desk 1TB 564 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 133GB free, PID 3320 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)	28.5% Poor	Read 71.8 Write 72.9 Mixed 69.8 92% 71.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.43 4K Write 0.69 4K Mixed 0.15 30% 0.42 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 28.5% Great: 71%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 4x8GB 41,916 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 4 of 4 slots used 32GB SODIMM DDR3 Performing below potential (30^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	47.9% Average	MC Read 16.2 MC Write 18.3 MC Mixed 15.9 48% 16.8 GB/s	SC Read 12.4 SC Write 13.8 SC Mixed 14 38% 13.4 GB/s	Latency 82.1 49% 82.1 ns
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 47.9% Great: 115%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical EliteBook 8560w Builds (Compare 466 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 55%

Yacht

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

System: HP EliteBook 8560w

CPU
Core i7-2820QMIntel $230Bench 59%, 4,929 samples	91x
Core i7-2670QMIntel $200Bench 56%, 51,169 samples	77x
Core i7-2620MIntelBench 52%, 16,111 samples	64x

GPU
Quadro 1000MNvidiaBench 3%, 6,108 samples	287x
Quadro 2000MNvidiaBench 5%, 3,227 samples	126x
FirePro M5950 AMDBench 5%, 1,394 samples	47x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	18x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	14x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	13x

RAM
2x4GBUnknownBench 39%, 424,126 samples	189x
4x4GBUnknownBench 43%, 106,178 samples	63x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	43x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 57% - Above average

Total price: $258

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16