Asus RAMPAGE IV EXTREME

Performance Results


Gaming 93% Nuclear submarine	Desktop 95% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 77% Battleship


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 93.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	95.6% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	69.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

Motherboard	Asus RAMPAGE IV EXTREME (all builds)
Memory	13.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	Цвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20140514
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Feb 06 '18 at 14:03
Run Duration	140 Seconds
Run User	RUS-User
Background CPU	20%

Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-4820K-$110 23,169 User benchmarks, average bench 72% LGA2011, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.75 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	93.1% Outstanding	Memory 96.1 1-Core 132 2-Core 265 92% 165 Pts	4-Core 495 8-Core 648 73% 572 Pts	64-Core 650 40% 650 Pts
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 93.1% Great: 81%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132 1,459,281 User benchmarks, average bench 80% Asus(1043 8599) CLim: 2126 MHz, MLim: 2122 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 390.77 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	95.6% Outstanding	Lighting 121 Reflection 126 Parallax 107 99% 118 fps	MRender 106 Gravity 110 Splatting 111 90% 109 fps
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 95.6% Great: 88%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
OCZ Trion 150 240GB-$196 15,660 User benchmarks, average bench 79% 101GB free (System drive) Firmware: 12.3 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (21^st percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 8208 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 1700 (A7) Unknown 100 100 0 (A8) Unknown 100 100 0 (A9) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 194 194 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 1055 (C2) HDA temperature 74 60 171799871514 (F1) Unknown 100 100 414345	69.2% Good	Read 524 Write 361 Mixed 355 92% 413 MB/s	4K Read 29.2 4K Write 55.8 4K Mixed 9.18 85% 31.4 MB/s	DQ Read 30.4 DQ Write 63.6 DQ Mixed 9.03 18% 34.3 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 69.2% Great: 95%
Samsung HM500JI 500GB-$100 8,795 User benchmarks, average bench 35% 132GB free Firmware: 01C4 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing as expected (44^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 28 (02) Throughput performance 252 252 0 (03) Spinup time 91 89 2930 (04) Start/Stop count 90 90 10681 (05) Reallocated sector count 252 252 0 (07) Seek error rate 252 252 0 (08) Seek timer performance 252 252 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 13277 (0A) Spinup retry count 252 252 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 96 96 4462 (0C) Power cycle count 95 95 5447 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 1128 (C0) Power-off retract count 252 252 0 (C2) HDA temperature 64 58 231928954907 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 0 (C4) Reallocation count 252 252 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 252 252 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 252 252 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 1 (C8) Write error rate 100 100 1205 (DF) Load/unload retry count 96 96 4462 (E1) Load/Unload cycle count 43 43 584248	34.3% Below average	Read 54.8 Write 64.6 Mixed 50.7 42% 56.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.3 4K Write 1.61 4K Mixed 0.3 75% 0.74 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 34.3% Great: 47%
Toshiba P300 1TB-$67 318,836 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 132GB free Firmware: A8J0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (37^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 143 143 67 (03) Spinup time 126 126 12896895157 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 4011 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 113 113 35 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 6569 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 736 (C0) Power-off retract count 96 96 5452 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 96 96 5452 (C2) HDA temperature 193 193 167504904223 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	79.3% Very good	Read 119 Write 158 Mixed 142 105% 139 MB/s	4K Read 0.64 4K Write 1.64 4K Mixed 0.19 78% 0.82 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 79.3% Great: 107%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 2400 C11 4x4GB 5,522 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 4 of 8 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	102% Outstanding	MC Read 38.7 MC Write 37.5 MC Mixed 40.7 111% 39 GB/s	SC Read 20.5 SC Write 18 SC Mixed 16.1 52% 18.2 GB/s	Latency 53.5 75% 53.5 ns
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 102% Great: 91%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical RAMPAGE IV EXTREME Builds (Compare 1,560 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 42%

Speed boat

Desktop 79%

Battleship

Workstation 37%

Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus RAMPAGE IV EXTREME - $589

CPU
Core i7-3930KIntel $280Bench 74%, 33,172 samples	527x
Core i7-4930KIntel $90Bench 77%, 22,204 samples	272x
Core i7-3820IntelBench 70%, 38,674 samples	180x

GPU
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	122x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	115x
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	112x

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	49x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	40x
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $130Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	38x

RAM
HyperX DDR3 2400 C11 4x8GBKingstonBench 70%, 5,910 samples	37x
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBCorsairBench 53%, 34,385 samples	22x
RipjawsZ DDR3 2133 C9 4x4GBG.SKILLBench 73%, 3,160 samples	21x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 59% - Above average

Total price: $1,178

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16