HP Pavilion dv6000 (GH095EA#UUW)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 32.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (93%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago.

System	HP Pavilion dv6000 (GH095EA#UUW) (all builds)
Motherboard	Quanta 30BB
Memory	0.8 GB free of 2 GB @ 0.5 GHz
Display	1280 x 800 - 32 Bit farver
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20070202
Uptime	23.8 Days
Run Date	Feb 05 '18 at 18:10
Run Duration	151 Seconds
Run User	DNK-User
Background CPU	93%

PC Performing as expected (51^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel T2080-$150 496 User benchmarks, average bench 31% U2E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.75 GHz, turbo 1.7 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)	32.7% Below average	Memory 60.8 1-Core 14.2 2-Core 32.8 27% 35.9 Pts	4-Core 31.1 8-Core 27.7 4% 29.4 Pts	64-Core 32.6 2% 32.6 Pts
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 32.7% Great: 36%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Fujitsu MJA2320BH G2 320GB 1,111 User benchmarks, average bench 29% 283GB free (System drive) Firmware: 8919 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 154552 (02) Throughput performance 253 253 47644672 (03) Spinup time 100 100 1 (04) Start/Stop count 98 98 7133 (05) Reallocated sector count 253 253 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 1754 (08) Seek timer performance 253 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 81 81 9513 (0A) Spinup retry count 253 253 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 253 253 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 7059 (B4) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 253 253 0 (B8) Unknown 253 253 0 (B9) Unknown 253 253 0 (BA) Unknown 253 253 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 99 10 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 71 33 4673428914205 (BF) G-sense error rate 253 97 16580672 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 6815848 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 98 98 51233 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 253 253 11807 (C4) Reallocation count 253 253 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 253 253 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 253 253 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 253 253 0	42% Average	Read 72.7 Write 73.6 Mixed 68.1 54% 71.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.38 4K Write 1.48 4K Mixed 0.24 70% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 42% Great: 44%
SanDisk Extreme Go USB 3.1 64GB-$23 2,139 User benchmarks, average bench 37% 27GB free, PID 558b Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	14.2% Very poor	Read 31.2 Write 13.4 Mixed 20.1 25% 21.5 MB/s	4K Read 3.77 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.93 110% 2.2 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 14.2% Great: 64%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x1GB 68,489 User benchmarks, average bench 14% 2 of 2 slots used 2GB DIMM DDR2 Performing below potential (27^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	9.98% Terrible	MC Read 3.5 MC Write 2.4 MC Mixed 2.7 8% 2.87 GB/s	SC Read 2.3 SC Write 2.7 SC Mixed 2.1 7% 2.37 GB/s	Latency 125 32% 125 ns
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 9.98% Great: 20%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16