Asus G73Jw

Performance Results


Gaming 8% Tree trunk	Desktop 62% Destroyer	Workstation 7% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	6.92% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	20.7% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

8 years ago, 8 years ago.

System	Asus G73Jw (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK G73Jw
Memory	6.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20100805
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Feb 01 '16 at 05:08
Run Duration	165 Seconds
Run User	CAN-User
Background CPU	21%

PC Performing as expected (55^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7 Q 740-$190 13,278 User benchmarks, average bench 54% Socket 989, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 1.75 GHz, turbo 1.95 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	63.1% Good	Memory 94.9 1-Core 73.4 2-Core 126 62% 98.1 Pts	4-Core 173 8-Core 249 26% 211 Pts	64-Core 256 16% 256 Pts
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 63.1% Great: 62%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTX 460M 3,887 User benchmarks, average bench 6% Asus(1043 2042) 1.5GB Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 10.18.13.5354 Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	6.92% Terrible	Lighting 7.7 Reflection 9.54 Parallax 6.66 6% 7.96 fps	MRender 10.5 Gravity 8.63 Splatting 10.6 8% 9.91 fps
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 6.92% Great: 7%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
OCZ VERTEX2 40GB 135 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 9GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1.23 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 3518327 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 53893249644975 (0C) Power cycle count 97 97 3553 (AB) Unknown 0 0 0 (AC) Unknown 0 0 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 446 (B1) Unknown 0 0 1 (B5) Unknown 0 0 0 (B6) Unknown 0 0 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 1 129 545469300737 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 3518327 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (E7) Temperature 99 99 0 (E9) Unknown 0 0 8256 (EA) Unknown 0 0 10752 (F1) Unknown 0 0 10752 (F2) Unknown 0 0 11328	20.7% Poor	Read 137 Write 45.4 Mixed 71.5 18% 84.8 MB/s	4K Read 11 4K Write 27.4 4K Mixed 6.96 40% 15.1 MB/s	DQ Read 10.3 DQ Write 21.3 DQ Mixed 4.67 7% 12.1 MB/s
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 20.7% Great: 41%
TOSHIBA MK2552GSX 250GB 10 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 227GB free, PID 5106 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	12% Very poor	Read 27.1 Write 20.1 Mixed 13.3 24% 20.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.18 4K Mixed 0.27 51% 0.62 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 12% Great: 20%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMT325S6BFR8C-H9 4x2GB 455 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 4 of 4 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR3 1333 MHz Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)	41.7% Average	MC Read 16.3 MC Write 12.3 MC Mixed 13.3 40% 14 GB/s	SC Read 11.6 SC Write 9.4 SC Mixed 10.7 30% 10.6 GB/s	Latency 57.5 70% 57.5 ns
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 41.7% Great: 48%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical G73Jw Builds (Compare 97 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 54%

Yacht

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

System: Asus G73Jw

CPU
Core i7 Q 740Intel $190Bench 54%, 13,278 samples	88x
Core i7 Q 840Intel $85Bench 56%, 1,339 samples	3x
Core i5 M 460Intel $130Bench 40%, 18,336 samples	3x

GPU
GeForce GTX 460MNvidiaBench 6%, 3,887 samples	96x
GTX 670Nvidia $435Bench 28%, 47,610 samples	1x

SSD
SSDNow V300 120GBKingston $37Bench 54%, 339,020 samples	5x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	5x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	4x

RAM
EBJ21UE8BFU0-DJ-F 4x2GBUnknownBench 42%, 289 samples	20x
HMT325S6BFR8C-H9 4x2GBHynixBench 41%, 455 samples	19x
HMT325S6BFR8C-H9 3x2GBHynixBench 35%, 234 samples	3x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 51% - Above average

Total price: $227

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16