HP Z820 Workstation

Performance Results


Gaming 15% Tree trunk	Desktop 59% Gunboat	Workstation 16% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (16th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 84 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	13.3% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	95.6% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Very high background CPU (48%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago.

System	HP Z820 Workstation (all builds)
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 158B
Memory	48.9 GB free of 64 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display	1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20161017
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	Feb 05 '18 at 14:27
Run Duration	205 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	48%

PC Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 1,377 User benchmarks, average bench 66% CPU0, 2 CPU, 20 cores, 20 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	55.7% Above average	Memory 52.4 1-Core 77.2 2-Core 156 53% 95.1 Pts	4-Core 316 8-Core 646 56% 481 Pts	64-Core 1,615 100% 1,615 Pts
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 55.7% Great: 74%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K4000 11,114 User benchmarks, average bench 13% HP(103C 079C) 3GB CLim: 810 MHz, MLim: 1404 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 385.69 Performing above expectations (77^th percentile)	13.3% Very poor	Lighting 15.2 Reflection 14.2 Parallax 18.7 12% 16 fps	MRender 21 Gravity 18.6 Splatting 16.7 15% 18.8 fps
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 13.3% Great: 13%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$130 154,399 User benchmarks, average bench 110% 931GB free Firmware: 3B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below potential (2^nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 28 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 37 (B1) Unknown 100 100 0 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 72 69 28 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 3 (F1) Unknown 99 99 5577573	56.4% Above average	Read 261 Write 205 Mixed 217 51% 227 MB/s	4K Read 26 4K Write 34.9 4K Mixed 23.9 88% 28.2 MB/s	DQ Read 168 DQ Write 115 DQ Mixed 85.1 79% 123 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 56.4% Great: 133%
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$130 154,399 User benchmarks, average bench 110% 931GB free Firmware: 2B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below potential (2^nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 28 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 37 (B1) Unknown 100 100 0 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 72 68 28 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 3 (F1) Unknown 99 99 5900070	56.8% Above average	Read 261 Write 204 Mixed 215 50% 227 MB/s	4K Read 25 4K Write 30.8 4K Mixed 27.9 90% 27.9 MB/s	DQ Read 146 DQ Write 114 DQ Mixed 74.1 71% 111 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 56.8% Great: 133%
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$130 154,399 User benchmarks, average bench 110% 928GB free Firmware: 2B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 28 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 37 (B1) Unknown 100 100 0 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 71 69 29 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 3 (F1) Unknown 99 99 14240362	80.7% Excellent	Read 478 Write 302 Mixed 353 84% 378 MB/s	4K Read 34.6 4K Write 42 4K Mixed 28 111% 34.9 MB/s	DQ Read 268 DQ Write 159 DQ Mixed 95.1 103% 174 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 80.7% Great: 133%
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$130 154,399 User benchmarks, average bench 110% 709GB free Firmware: 2B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 28 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 37 (B1) Unknown 100 100 0 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 70 69 30 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 100 100 0 (F1) Unknown 99 99 475106103	77.8% Very good	Read 479 Write 303 Mixed 351 84% 378 MB/s	4K Read 32 4K Write 39.2 4K Mixed 29.3 107% 33.5 MB/s	DQ Read 198 DQ Write 130 DQ Mixed 58.1 72% 129 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 77.8% Great: 133%
Samsung XP941 PCIe M.2 512GB 1,482 User benchmarks, average bench 128% 332GB free (System drive) Firmware: UXM62H1Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (09) Power-on hours count 95 95 25034 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 733 (B1) Unknown 92 92 290 (B2) Unknown 92 92 410 (B3) Unknown 92 92 810 (B4) Unknown 92 92 9686 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0	95.6% Outstanding	Read 818 Write 596 Mixed 621 150% 678 MB/s	4K Read 21.1 4K Write 30.8 4K Mixed 21.8 76% 24.6 MB/s	DQ Read 68.6 DQ Write 62.9 DQ Mixed 37.6 36% 56.4 MB/s
Poor: 75% ↑ This bench: 95.6% Great: 166%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMT41GR7AFR4C-RD 8x8GB 307 User benchmarks, average bench 94% 8 of 16 slots used 64GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1866 MHz Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	71.5% Very good	MC Read 38.2 MC Write 23 MC Mixed 28.3 85% 29.8 GB/s	SC Read 6.6 SC Write 2.4 SC Mixed 6 14% 5 GB/s	Latency 152 26% 152 ns
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 71.5% Great: 117%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Z820 Workstation Builds (Compare 1,749 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 18%

Surfboard

Desktop 66%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 19%

Surfboard

System: HP Z820 Workstation

CPU
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2670 01stBench 65%, 4,306 samples	145x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2690 01stBench 68%, 2,388 samples	113x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2687W 01stBench 71%, 1,646 samples	87x

GPU
Quadro K4000NvidiaBench 13%, 11,114 samples	145x
Quadro K5000NvidiaBench 21%, 3,775 samples	139x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	65x

SSD
860 500GBSamsungBench 89%, 2,934 samples	55x
860 1TBSamsungBench 86%, 2,531 samples	37x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	32x

RAM
M393B2G70DB0-CMA 16x16GBSamsungBench 101%, 41 samples	25x
M391B5173QH0-CMA 8x4GBSamsungBench 84%, 111 samples	19x
M393B1G70QH0-CMA 4x8GBSamsungBench 82%, 512 samples	18x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16