Asrock Z270M-ITX/ac

Performance Results


Gaming 13% Tree trunk	Desktop 76% Battleship	Workstation 12% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (75th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 25 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	6.96% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	94.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asrock Z270M-ITX/ac (all builds)
Memory	14 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170517
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Feb 05 '18 at 12:16
Run Duration	164 Seconds
Run User	BEL-User
Background CPU	5%

PC Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-7100-$70 79,299 User benchmarks, average bench 57% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	73.6% Very good	Memory 87.6 1-Core 125 2-Core 215 82% 142 Pts	4-Core 345 8-Core 348 46% 346 Pts	64-Core 346 21% 346 Pts
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 73.6% Great: 69%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 630 (Desktop Kaby Lake) 153,031 User benchmarks, average bench 5% ASRock(1849 5912) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 22.20.16.4836 Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	6.96% Terrible	Lighting 7.17 Reflection 10.5 Parallax 6.91 6% 8.18 fps	MRender 10.7 Gravity 6.27 Splatting 15 9% 10.7 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 6.96% Great: 7%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZ7TD256HAFV-000L7 256GB 6,630 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 238GB free Firmware: DXT06L6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 988 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 741 (AF) Unknown 100 100 0 (B0) Unknown 100 100 0 (B1) Unknown 98 98 23 (B2) Unknown 100 100 0 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B4) Unknown 100 100 6240 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 79 60 21 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 253 253 3 (E9) Unknown 199 199 57569 (EA) Unknown 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 78 (EC) Unknown 99 99 18 (ED) Unknown 99 99 23 (EE) Unknown 100 100 0	72.6% Very good	Read 462 Write 237 Mixed 234 68% 311 MB/s	4K Read 23.2 4K Write 89.2 4K Mixed 10.9 96% 41.1 MB/s	DQ Read 356 DQ Write 200 DQ Mixed 10.7 80% 189 MB/s
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 72.6% Great: 80%
Samsung MZNLN256HMHQ-00000 256GB 10,917 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 208GB free (System drive) Firmware: MAV2100Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (43^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 103 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 167 (AA) Unknown 100 100 0 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 99 99 1 (AE) Unknown 99 99 52 (B2) Unknown 100 100 0 (B4) Unknown 100 100 817 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 70 46 30 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (E9) Unknown 99 99 16763233 (F1) Unknown 99 99 608 (F2) Unknown 99 99 1078 (F9) Unknown 99 99 608	94.3% Outstanding	Read 493 Write 466 Mixed 496 108% 485 MB/s	4K Read 38 4K Write 118 4K Mixed 22.4 148% 59.3 MB/s	DQ Read 36.2 DQ Write 103 DQ Mixed 134 84% 91.1 MB/s
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 94.3% Great: 116%
Samsung 850 Evo 120GB-$80 69,224 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 73GB free Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (36^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 654 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 524 (B1) Unknown 98 98 27 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 74 54 26 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 42 (F1) Unknown 99 99 4812893851	94.8% Outstanding	Read 495 Write 387 Mixed 412 96% 431 MB/s	4K Read 34.9 4K Write 98.2 4K Mixed 19.1 129% 50.7 MB/s	DQ Read 344 DQ Write 287 DQ Mixed 18.8 95% 217 MB/s
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 94.8% Great: 115%
Seagate ST310005 28AS 1TB 6,973 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 897GB free Firmware: 0 Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	66.6% Good	Read 114 Write 118 Mixed 88.2 80% 107 MB/s	4K Read 0.41 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.41 85% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 66.6% Great: 69%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial CT8G4DFD824A.C16FHP 2x8GB 2,200 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)	80% Excellent	MC Read 28.6 MC Write 31.6 MC Mixed 24.5 81% 28.2 GB/s	SC Read 17.1 SC Write 33.7 SC Mixed 25.4 73% 25.4 GB/s	Latency 69.9 57% 69.9 ns
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 80% Great: 86%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Z270M-ITX/ac Builds (Compare 334 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 71%

Battleship

Desktop 89%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 60%

Destroyer

Motherboard: Asrock Z270M-ITX/ac

CPU
Core i7-7700KIntel $230Bench 84%, 712,312 samples	154x
Core i5-7600KIntel $190Bench 76%, 195,006 samples	75x
Core i5-7400Intel $95Bench 64%, 234,266 samples	19x

GPU
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	53x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	47x
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	27x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	14x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GBSamsung $45Bench 199%, 240,629 samples	12x
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $130Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	11x

RAM
DDR4 3000 2OZ 2x8GBUnknownBench 79%, 14,178 samples	33x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	24x
Ripjaws V DDR4 2400 C15 2x8GBG.SKILL $31Bench 71%, 98,777 samples	13x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 102% - Outstanding

Total price: $390

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16