Toshiba Satellite A660

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 8%
Tree trunk
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 7.37%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics0.91% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 99% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
SystemToshiba Satellite A660  (all builds)
MotherboardTOSHIBA NWQAA
Memory4.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100914
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 04 '18 at 00:12
Run Duration419 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 100%
CPU Throttled 99%

 PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5 M 460-$130
CPU, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.55 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
Relative performance (0th percentile)
7.37% Terrible
Memory 6.22
1-Core 19.2
2-Core 37.1
11% 20.8 Pts
4-Core 47
8-Core 59.3
7% 53.2 Pts
64-Core 70.2
4% 70.2 Pts
Poor: 25%
This bench: 7.37%
Great: 47%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (Arrandale 0.667/0.766 GHz)
Toshiba(1179 FD30) 3.8GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2900
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
0.91% Terrible
Lighting 0.97
Reflection 1.15
Parallax 0.94
1% 1.02 fps
MRender 1.52
Gravity 0.77
Splatting 1.78
1% 1.36 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.91%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 2.5" 500GB-$21
283GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
41% Average
Read 71.6
Write 71.4
Mixed 73.4
54% 72.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.42
4K Write 0.99
4K Mixed 0.22
60% 0.54 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 41%
Great: 61%
Kingston DataTraveler 101 G2 USB 2.0 32GB-$15
18GB free, PID 1642
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
3.49% Terrible
Read 15.5
Write 5.25
Mixed 5.37
9% 8.71 MB/s
4K Read 0.35
4K Write 0.004
4K Mixed 0.002
2% 0.12 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 3.49%
Great: 10%
Lexar USB Flash Drive 16GB
6GB free, PID a20b, Lexar
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
6.1% Terrible
Read 18.7
Write 10.4
Mixed 13.6
17% 14.2 MB/s
4K Read 4.65
4K Write 0.006
4K Mixed 0.005
18% 1.55 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 6.1%
Great: 10%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown HMT351S6AFR8C-G7 Kingston ASU1600S11-4G-EDEG 8GB
1067, 1067 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
11% Very poor
MC Read 4.2
MC Write 3.5
MC Mixed 4.6
12% 4.1 GB/s
SC Read 2.4
SC Write 1.8
SC Mixed 2.9
7% 2.37 GB/s
Latency 440
9% 440 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Satellite A660 Builds (Compare 106 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Toshiba Satellite A660

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 55% - Above average Total price: $218
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback