ADD TO PC
BUILD

Supermicro H8QM3

Performance Results


Gaming 14% Tree trunk	Desktop 43% Speed boat	Workstation 16% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 33.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	36.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	15.8% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	Supermicro H8QM3 (all builds)
Motherboard	Supermicro H8QM3
Memory	14.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 0.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20101210
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Feb 03 '18 at 20:27
Run Duration	231 Seconds
Run User	BIH-User
Background CPU	2%

PC Performing as expected (49^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Six-Core AMD Opteron 8431 7 User benchmarks, average bench 40% CPU 1, 4 CPU, 24 cores, 24 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)	33.2% Below average	Memory 40.2 1-Core 35.4 2-Core 70.9 29% 48.8 Pts	4-Core 141 8-Core 283 25% 212 Pts	64-Core 850 53% 850 Pts
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 33.2% Great: 50%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD R9 280X-$500 94,130 User benchmarks, average bench 35% XFX(1682 3001) 3GB CLim: 1000 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 17.8.1 Performing way above expectations (85^th percentile)	36.9% Below average	Lighting 48.1 Reflection 32.2 Parallax 60.7 39% 47 fps	MRender 30.6 Gravity 47.2 Splatting 39.8 32% 39.2 fps
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 36.9% Great: 39%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Corsair Force LE 240GB 50 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 35GB free (System drive) Firmware: 12.1 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	15.8% Very poor	Read 131 Write 91.4 Mixed 76.5 22% 99.8 MB/s	4K Read 1.01 4K Write 0.001 4K Mixed 9.21 13% 3.41 MB/s
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 15.8% Great: 88%
WD Blue 640GB (2008)-$33 94,563 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 238GB free Firmware: 3B01 Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)	55.5% Above average	Read 87.4 Write 106 Mixed 81.7 69% 91.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.47 4K Write 1.79 4K Mixed 0.4 98% 0.89 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 55.5% Great: 62%
Samsung SP2004C 200GB-$46 4,063 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 34GB free Firmware: 0-50 Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)	19.9% Very poor	Read 30.6 Write 38.5 Mixed 33.3 26% 34.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.33 4K Write 0.81 4K Mixed 0.24 55% 0.46 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 19.9% Great: 32%
WD Blue 640GB (2008)-$33 94,563 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 15GB free Firmware: 3B01 Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	61.1% Good	Read 107 Write 106 Mixed 102 79% 105 MB/s	4K Read 0.63 4K Write 1.76 4K Mixed 0.44 108% 0.94 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 61.1% Great: 62%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 8x2GB 8,850 User benchmarks, average bench 114% 8 of 32 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR2 Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	22.8% Poor	MC Read 7.2 MC Write 9.1 MC Mixed 7.9 23% 8.07 GB/s	SC Read 5.9 SC Write 7.2 SC Mixed 6.6 19% 6.57 GB/s	Latency 201 20% 201 ns
Poor: 76% ↑ This bench: 22.8% Great: 142%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

The Best.

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback