Asus M4N72-E

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (82nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 18 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics21.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive85.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago.
MotherboardAsus M4N72-E  (all builds)
Memory6.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20110414
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 03 '18 at 17:29
Run Duration171 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Phenom II X4 980
AM2, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
60.6% Good
Memory 84.3
1-Core 54.4
2-Core 109
53% 82.6 Pts
4-Core 216
8-Core 217
29% 216 Pts
64-Core 217
13% 217 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 60.6%
Great: 64%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R7 370-$153
PowerColor(148C 2015) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 860 MHz, MLim: 1425 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 18.2.1
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
21.7% Poor
Lighting 26.2
Reflection 28.1
Parallax 31.3
21% 28.5 fps
MRender 25.8
Gravity 20.9
Splatting 33.2
22% 26.6 fps
Poor: 19%
This bench: 21.7%
Great: 23%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 EVO 250G 250GB
86GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT0
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
85.7% Excellent
Read 379
Write 286
Mixed 304
72% 323 MB/s
4K Read 46
4K Write 70.9
4K Mixed 31.4
147% 49.4 MB/s
DQ Read 245
DQ Write 164
DQ Mixed 117
111% 176 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 85.7%
Great: 122%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$36
466GB free
Firmware: CC38
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
70% Good
Read 126
Write 118
Mixed 109
88% 118 MB/s
4K Read 0.71
4K Write 1.88
4K Mixed 0.53
123% 1.04 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 70%
Great: 70%
Seagate ST3300622AS 300GB-$130
279GB free
Firmware: 3.AAH Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
36.9% Below average
Read 64.7
Write 63.5
Mixed 26.2
38% 51.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.68
4K Write 1.34
4K Mixed 0.39
97% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 36.9%
Great: 37%
Seagate ST9120817AS 120GB
7GB free
Firmware: 3.AH
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
34.1% Below average
Read 59.3
Write 59.3
Mixed 57.6
44% 58.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.53
4K Write 0.89
4K Mixed 0.33
75% 0.58 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 34.1%
Great: 34%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR2
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
28.5% Poor
MC Read 10.4
MC Write 7.6
MC Mixed 10
27% 9.33 GB/s
SC Read 6.7
SC Write 6.4
SC Mixed 8.3
20% 7.13 GB/s
Latency 73
55% 73 ns
Poor: 14%
This bench: 28.5%
Great: 45%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M4N72-E Builds (Compare 14 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus M4N72-E

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 39% - Below average Total price: $422
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback