Fujitsu AMILO Pi 2540

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Tree trunk	Desktop 13% Tree trunk	Workstation 0% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 31.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	0.57% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Fujitsu AMILO Pi 2540 (all builds)
Motherboard	FUJITSU F45
Memory	1.1 GB free of 2 GB @ 0.5 GHz
Display	1280 x 800 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20080117
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Feb 03 '18 at 02:26
Run Duration	374 Seconds
Run User	SRB-User
Background CPU	14%

PC Performing as expected (50^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Pentium Dual T2330-$90 867 User benchmarks, average bench 29% U2E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.6 GHz Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)	31.3% Below average	Memory 56.9 1-Core 18 2-Core 27.5 26% 34.1 Pts	4-Core 36.1 8-Core 36 5% 36 Pts	64-Core 36 2% 36 Pts
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 31.3% Great: 36%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
ATI Mobility Radeon HD 2400 634 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Fijitsu Siemens(1734 1107) 256MB Driver: atidxx32.dll Ver. 8.56.1.16 Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)	0.57% Terrible	Lighting 0.63 Reflection 1.12 Parallax 0.47 0% 0.74 fps	MRender 0.9 Gravity 0.23 Splatting 1.22 1% 0.79 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.57% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Seagate ST9250315AS 250GB-$20 12,691 User benchmarks, average bench 31% 222GB free (System drive) Firmware: 0003DEM1 Max speed: SATA 1.0 150 MB/s Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 119 73 205120423 (03) Spinup time 100 99 0 (04) Start/Stop count 95 95 5452 (05) Reallocated sector count 99 99 36 (07) Seek error rate 84 60 4534388411 (09) Power-on hours count 84 84 14118 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 95 95 5271 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 1 1 6870 (BC) Unknown 100 98 120260919378 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 69 36 22695128989727 (BF) G-sense error rate 44 44 113027 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 616 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 13 13 175132 (C2) HDA temperature 31 64 38654705695 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 55 43 205120423 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 4 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 4 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 -121616293940608 (F1) Unknown 100 253 3423016765 (F2) Unknown 100 253 315685665 (FE) Unknown 100 100 0	37.2% Below average	Read 64.3 Write 65.3 Mixed 24.7 38% 51.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.33 4K Write 0.91 4K Mixed 0.34 68% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 37.2% Great: 43%
USB FLASH DRIVE 8GB 2,112 User benchmarks, average bench 5% 2GB free, PID b113 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)	2.81% Terrible	Read 10.9 Write 3.36 Mixed 3.42 6% 5.9 MB/s	4K Read 2.06 4K Write 0.004 4K Mixed 0.005 8% 0.69 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 2.81% Great: 9%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x1GB 68,489 User benchmarks, average bench 14% 2 of 2 slots used 2GB SODIMM DDR2 Performing below potential (27^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	10.2% Very poor	MC Read 3.9 MC Write 2.4 MC Mixed 2.6 8% 2.97 GB/s	SC Read 3.4 SC Write 1.9 SC Mixed 3.1 8% 2.8 GB/s	Latency 137 29% 137 ns
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 10.2% Great: 20%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical AMILO Pi 2540 Builds (Compare 3 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 1%

Tree trunk

Desktop 15%

Tree trunk

Workstation 1%

Tree trunk

System: Fujitsu AMILO Pi 2540

CPU
Pentium Dual T2390IntelBench 29%, 1,249 samples	2x
Pentium Dual T2330Intel $90Bench 29%, 867 samples	1x

GPU
Mobility Radeon HD 2400ATIBench 1%, 634 samples	3x

SSD
AS340 120GBApacerBench 67%, 5,956 samples	1x

RAM
2x1GBUnknownBench 14%, 68,489 samples	2x
3GBUnknownBench 14%, 81,553 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Fujitsu AMILO Pi 2540

Performance Results

PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

System: Fujitsu AMILO Pi 2540

Feedback

PC Performing as expected (50^th percentile)